{"id":1327681,"date":"2023-10-20T07:30:25","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T06:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/?p=1327681"},"modified":"2023-10-20T07:49:23","modified_gmt":"2023-10-20T06:49:23","slug":"fpl-midfielders-gameweek-9-budget-differential-premium-tips","status":"publish","type":"gaming","link":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/gaming\/fpl-midfielders-gameweek-9-budget-differential-premium-tips\/","title":{"rendered":"FPL best midfielder picks: Budget, differential and premium tips for Gameweek 9"},"content":{"rendered":"

Can you pick the right midfield options for FPL success? We’ve crunched the numbers to identify the best picks ahead of Gameweek 9.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Among the higher point-scorers in FPL are the players who pull the strings from the middle of the park, whether they excel in making or scoring goals.<\/p>\n

Our FPL rating system — Squawka Score<\/em> — has been engineered to identify the best attacking midfielders in the Premier League, judging a player’s output per 90 minutes for a group of specifically selected stats.<\/p>\n

What is the Squawka Score?\u00a0You can learn more about how we devised our fantasy football ranking system here<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you think you can beat our FPL boffins, you can\u00a0join the Squawka Challenge League here<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Best FPL midfielders<\/strong>
\n<\/a>Top midfielder pick for Gameweek 9<\/strong>
\n<\/a>Best cheap midfielders for Gameweek 9<\/strong>
\n<\/a>Best midfielders with easy fixtures<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>Man City and Arsenal dominate top midfielders list<\/b><\/h2>\n

Here are the top 10 Premier League midfielders based on their FPL Squawka Score from the 2023 calendar year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Player<\/b><\/td>\nFPL <\/b>Squawka Score<\/b><\/td>\n23\/24 Team<\/b><\/td>\n23\/24 FPL Price<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Phil Foden<\/td>\n89%<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n7.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mo Salah<\/td>\n88%<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n12.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jack Grealish<\/td>\n87%<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n7.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bruno Fernandes<\/td>\n86%<\/td>\nMan United<\/td>\n8.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bukayo Saka<\/td>\n85%<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n8.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Gabriel Martinelli<\/td>\n84%<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n7.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Solly March<\/td>\n84%<\/td>\nBrighton<\/td>\n6.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Martin \u00d8degaard<\/td>\n83%<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n8.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bryan Mbeumo<\/td>\n82%<\/td>\nBrentford<\/td>\n6.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Anthony Gordon<\/td>\n80%<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n5.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/h2>\n

<\/a>Which Liverpool winger is the key play?<\/b><\/h2>\n

Every week, we will bring you a Differential Duel<\/em> to highlight a player who both ranks well according to our Squawka Score system and isn\u2019t being picked by the vast majority of FPL managers.<\/p>\n

We will then crunch the numbers and pit the chosen differential against a comparable asset who is proving popular \u2014 it is then on you to choose your fighter.<\/p>\n

This week, we’ll be comparing Brighton teammates, Mo Salah (35.2%) and Luis Diaz (9.5%).<\/p>\n

Liverpool have been in great form this season, and we think that there could be a great saving by switching from Salah to Diaz.<\/p>\n

Whilst Salah is ahead on the key metrics, Diaz is not far behind and, with Liverpool having several key Premier League and Champions League matches, a move to Diaz could yield good dividends as fixtures pile up.<\/p>\n

The added benefit of a move from Salah to Diaz is an extra 5.0m in funds!<\/p>\n

Here’s how their 2023\/24 stats compare on our Comparison Matrix<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>Plenty of cheap options to mull over<\/b><\/h2>\n

We all want to load up on premium picks, but your \u00a3100million budget must always be in the back of your mind.<\/p>\n

This is where bargains come in handy to balance out your squad. Using our Squawka super computer, we have picked out some budget midfielders for consideration who fare best according to the key fantasy football metrics.<\/p>\n

The best 5.0 picks for 23\/24 FPL<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Anthony Elanga, Nottingham Forest (64%)<\/li>\n
  2. David Brooks, Bournemouth (64%)<\/li>\n
  3. Pablo Sarabia, Wolves (64%)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    The best 5.5 picks for 23\/24 FPL<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Fabio Vieira, Arsenal (63%)<\/li>\n
    2. Manor Solomon, Spurs (63%)<\/li>\n
    3. Leon Bailey, Aston Villa (61%)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \"\"
      \n<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The best 6.0 picks for 23\/24 FPL<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Anthony Gordon, Newcastle (80%)<\/li>\n
      2. Pedro Neto, Wolves (58%)<\/li>\n
      3. Morgan Gibbs-White, Nottingham Forest (48%)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        \"\"<\/p>\n

        \u00a0<\/a>Best midfielders with easy fixtures<\/b><\/h2>\n

        Is your midfield almost set and ready to go? Hold fire for a moment — we have only more factor for you to consider before submitting your team.<\/p>\n

        Below, using our Squawka Score system and the FPL\u2019s official Fixture Difficulty Rating (FDR), we have the identified the top selections from each of the Premier League clubs deemed to have an ‘easy’ fixture in Gameweek 9.<\/p>\n

        \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        Team<\/b><\/td>\nTop pick<\/b><\/td>\nFPL <\/b>Squawka Score<\/b><\/td>\n23\/24 FPL Price<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Aston Villa<\/td>\nJacob Ramsey<\/td>\n74%<\/td>\n5.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Bournemouth<\/td>\nMathias Jensen<\/td>\n70%<\/td>\n5.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Brentford<\/td>\nBryan Mbeumo<\/td>\n82%<\/td>\n6.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Liverpool<\/span><\/td>\nMo Salah<\/td>\n88%<\/td>\n12.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Luton<\/span><\/td>\nJacob Brown<\/td>\n43%<\/td>\n4.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Man United<\/span><\/td>\nBruno Fernandes<\/td>\n86%<\/td>\n8.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Newcastle<\/span><\/td>\nAnthony Gordon<\/td>\n80%<\/td>\n5.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Nottingham Forest<\/span><\/td>\nMorgan Gibbs-White<\/td>\n71%<\/td>\n5.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Spurs<\/span><\/td>\nJames Maddison<\/td>\n76%<\/td>\n8.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Wolves<\/span><\/td>\nPedro Neto<\/td>\n68%<\/td>\n5.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

         <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

        READ MORE ON FPL GW9:<\/strong><\/div>\n