{"id":1395637,"date":"2026-05-25T19:48:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-25T18:48:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/?post_type=features&#038;p=1395637"},"modified":"2026-06-02T17:29:38","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T16:29:38","slug":"var-errors-premier-league-2025-26","status":"publish","type":"features","link":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/","title":{"rendered":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Each week, Squawka&#8217;s VAR table recalculates the standings by removing the impact of VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Those errors are as voted for by Squawka followers on our polls on X, based on each gameweek&#8217;s most controversial VAR calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By focusing only on the most recent round of fixtures, this alternative view highlights the immediate impact of officiating errors. And provides a fair reflection of team performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Premier League season is now over, with Sunday&#8217;s final day bringing the curtain down on the campaign. Let&#8217;s take a look at how the VAR errors from GW38 affected this hypothetical table.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-2025-26-premier-league-table-without-var-errors\">2025-26 Premier League table without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-1024x1024.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1451956\" srcset=\"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-1024x1024.png 1024w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-768x768.png 768w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-1536x1536.png 1536w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-267x267.png 267w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-200x200.png 200w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-60x60.png 60w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final-74x74.png 74w, https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2026\/05\/26095846\/2025-26-Premier-League-without-VAR-errors-final.png 1620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Note: Our table has been compiled on the basis that penalties that should have been awarded would subsequently have been scored. Since 2016-17, 80.22% of Premier League penalties taken have been scored.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-how-many-var-errors-have-gone-against-your-team\">How many VAR &#8216;errors&#8217; have gone against your team?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Manchester United have suffered the most this season, with nine &#8216;errors&#8217; against them. But Crystal Palace join Liverpool with a differential of -5, the worst overall. Arsenal have had the most &#8216;errors&#8217; go for them this season, with eight in total.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>CLUB<\/th><th>ERRORS FOR<\/th><th>ERRORS AGAINST<\/th><th>DIFFERENCE<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Liverpool<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>8<\/td><td>-5<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Crystal Palace<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>6<\/td><td>-5<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Man Utd<\/td><td>6<\/td><td>9<\/td><td>-3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tottenham<\/td><td>4<\/td><td>7<\/td><td>-3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Brentford<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>6<\/td><td>-3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Newcastle<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>7<\/td><td>-2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Everton<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>-2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Burnley<\/td><td>2<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>-1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Nottingham Forest<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>2<\/td><td>-1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Sunderland<\/td><td>2<\/td><td>2<\/td><td>0<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Man City<\/td><td>6<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>+1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Leeds<\/td><td>2<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>+1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fulham<\/td><td>6<\/td><td>4<\/td><td>+2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Aston Villa<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>+2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Brighton<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>+2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>West Ham<\/td><td>3<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>+2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Arsenal<\/td><td>8<\/td><td>5<\/td><td>+3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chelsea<\/td><td>7<\/td><td>4<\/td><td>+3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Wolves<\/td><td>4<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>+3<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bournemouth<\/td><td>7<\/td><td>1<\/td><td>+6<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">GW38 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were only two standout VAR flashpoints during the final day of the 2025-26 Premier League season.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-wolves-right-to-get-a-penalty\">Were Wolves right to get a penalty? <\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Burnley 1-1 Wolves<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (70.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Referee Andrew Kitchen turned down Wolves\u2019 appeals for a penalty after Florentino Luis appeared to block Ladislav Krejci\u2019s header with his arm. After VAR review, the decision was overturned and a penalty awarded, with Florentino\u2019s arm deemed to be \u2018away from his body\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-merlin-rohl-have-been-sent-off\">Should Merlin Rohl have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Tottenham 1-0 Everton<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (52.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Michael Oliver gave Everton a free-kick despite Merlin Rohl\u2019s follow-through leaving his studs on Micky van de Ven\u2019s lower leg. There was a brief VAR check, which backed the call that the contact was accidental and Van de Ven had, in fact, fouled Rohl in his attempt to dispossess the Everton man. Despite the poll outcome, this looked like the correct decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw37-var-controversies\">GW37 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was another big call in the penultimate gameweek of the season, and it could have a big impact at the bottom of the table. But it wasn&#8217;t alone, with five contentious decisions across the long weekend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-matheus-cunha-s-goal-have-counted\">Should Matheus Cunha&#8217;s goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man Utd 3-2 Nottingham Forest<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (85.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This one will go down as an error by the referee, rather than VAR alone. Because VAR actually recommended a review, with the referee eventually sticking with his initial decision. Man Utd went 2-1 up against Nottingham Forest when Matheus Cunha finished following a rebound in the box. But Forest players immediately protested, appealing for a handball by Bryan Mbeumo in the buildup. Replays showed the ball had indeed hit Mbeumo&#8217;s arm, allowing him to control the ball before a shot &#8212; which bounced back to Cunha. It was checked by VAR who recommended an on-field review. But after seeing the footage himself, referee Michael Salisbury stuck with his initial decision, dubbing the contact accidental.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PGMOL have since admitted that the goal should have been disallowed, apologising to Nottingham Forest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-fulham-s-penalty-fair\">Was Fulham&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Wolves 1-1 Fulham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (61.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fulham equalised from the penalty spot against Wolves, but it wasn&#8217;t initially given. Timothy Castagne went down in the box under a challenge from Mateus Mane, though the referee waved play on. It was checked by VAR, with replays showing that Mane had made slight contact with the Fulham man. A review was recommended an a penalty eventually given, with Mane deemed to have made a careless challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-newcastle-have-got-a-penalty\">Should Newcastle have got a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Newcastle 3-1 West Ham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (52.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle blew West Ham away in their game at St James&#8217; Park, but they could have got off to an even quicker start. The Magpies wanted a penalty after William Osula&#8217;s shot hit Tomas Soucek&#8217;s arm in the box. Soucek appeared to have leaned in to block the effort too, leading to claims of it being deliberate. But it was checked and cleared by VAR, deeming that Soucek&#8217;s arm was in a justifiable position due to his contact with Harvey Barnes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-kai-havertz-deserve-a-red\">Did Kai Havertz deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Arsenal 1-0 Burnley<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (84.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Opposition fans were furious to see Kai Havertz avoid a red card in Arsenal&#8217;s win over Burnley. It came a week after the frustrations surrounding West Ham&#8217;s (rightly) disallowed goal. Havertz fouled Lesley Ugochukwu in the second half, and was booked by the referee. He had caught the Burnley midfielder high on the leg, with his studs up. There have been instances of similar tackles resulting in a red card across ths season. But VAR confirmed the yellow card, as the tackle was not deemed to be serious foul play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-tottenham-denied-a-penalty\">Were Tottenham denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Chelsea 2-1 Tottenham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (54.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the second time in as many gameweeks, Tottenham feel they were denied a penalty. And, again, it could have big implications in the relegation battle. This one wasn&#8217;t as straightforward. As Tottenham prepared to take a corner, there were tussles inside the box. As the ball came in, the referee blew his whistle and booked Marc Cucurella for bringing down Micky van de Ven. But he didn&#8217;t appear interested in awarded a penalty, purportedly believing he was stopping the corner from being taken. Mathys Tel had delivered the ball at some point during the incident, though, so things were checked by VAR. They eventually came to the conclusion that Cucurella&#8217;s infringement had stopped by the time the ball was in may. Tottenham fans were not happy, showing screenshots of the ball in the air while the tussling appeared to still be going on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw36-var-controveries\">GW36 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This may be the most controversial gameweek in Premier League history when it comes to VAR. There was a massive goal overturned in Arsenal&#8217;s win over West Ham, which impacted both ends of the table. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-nilson-angulo-have-been-sent-off\">Should Nilson Angulo have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Sunderland 0-0 Man Utd<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (64.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This incident seems to have fallen along the wayside after the weekend&#8217;s action, but it brought unhappiness among Man Utd fans. Sunderland&#8217;s Nilson Angulo appeared to catch Bruno Fernandes in the head with an elbow, when challenging after the ball had gone in the middle of the pitch. By itself it should have been at foul at the very least, but nothing was given. Replays also purportedly showed Angulo making a deliberate movement with his elbow, rather than just catching Fernandes accidentally. But nothing was said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-bernardo-silva-lucky-to-avoid-a-red\">Was Bernardo Silva lucky to avoid a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man City 3-0 vs Brentford<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (72.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bernardo Silva was booked for an incident involving Nathan Collins against Brentford. The Man City captain was aggrieved with the way in which Collins had shrugged him off the ball after shepherding it out of play. Clearly, the referee saw what happened, which led to the yellow &#8212; as it wasn&#8217;t overly obvious to the wider viewer at the time. But replays showed Silva hitting Collins&#8217; leg with his arm, almost like a punch. A yellow card was deemed sufficient, though.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-aston-villa-denied-a-late-penalty\">Were Aston Villa denied a late penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Burnley 2-2 Aston Villa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (53.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aston Villa wanted a late penalty in their draw with Burnley after Emiliano Buendia went down in the box. The Argentinian had the ball near the byline, looking to turn to keep things going. He put himself in between Kyle Walker and the ball, before going down appealing for a penalty. Nothing was given by the referee but it was checked by VAR. Buendia remonstrated with the evidence of his boot being off his foot, and replays showed that Walker had stepped on the back of his heel. However, VAR were happy with the call of no penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-west-ham-s-equaliser-have-should\">Should West Ham&#8217;s equaliser have should?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>West Ham 0-1 Arsenal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (52.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here it is. Perhaps the most important VAR decision of the 2025-26 Premier League season. And it was a contentious one. West Ham thought they had equalised late on against Arsenal, with Callum Wilson finishing following a scramble from a corner. Jarrod Bowen&#8217;s set-piece went into the middle of the box, with David Raya appearing to flap at the ball &#8212; which eventually dropped to Wilson following a mishit clearance. The immediate appeal was that the ball crossed the line, as Declan Rice had cleared it. Chris Kavanagh&#8217;s watch beeped, with Goal Line Technology doing its job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But then came the wait. The goal was being checked for a potential foul by Pablo on Raya. Replays showed that the West Ham man had his hand on Raya&#8217;s arm, hampering the Spaniard&#8217;s ability to get the ball. Several incidents were checked around that foul for potential penalties, but they were deemed to have come after the initial foul on Raya. The goal was disallowed, which didn&#8217;t go down well with many outside Arsenal (and Tottenham) fans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;It&#8217;s the lack of consistency with the decisions,&#8221; Nuno Espirito Santo said after the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;These previous recent seasons have been having a lot of blocking, grappling, holding. Almost like a wrestling situation that all of us don&#8217;t even understand what is a foul, what is not a foul. I think even the referees confuse themselves.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-tottenham-denied-a-penalty-0\">Were Tottenham denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Tottenham 1-1 Leeds<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (56.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The relegation-battle VAR drama wasn&#8217;t done there. Tottenham felt they should have had a late penalty and a chance to win their game against Leeds. James Maddison went down in the box under a challenge from Lukas Nmecha, having come on for his first appearance of the season. The referee did not award a penalty, and it was checked by VAR. They believed Nmecha had got a slight touch on the ball before indeed brining Maddison down. So the decision was no penalty. After the game, Maddison posted a screenshot of the incident on Instagram, saying the ball changed direction because he touched it &#8212; not Nmecha. He added: &#8220;Officials are petrified to make decisions on pitch now because of VAR.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw35-var-controveries\">GW35 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Premier League had a full weekend of fixtures, with three controversial decisions. That included one in the big clash between Man Utd and Liverpool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-dan-ballard-deserve-a-red\">Did Dan Ballard deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Wolves 1-1 Sunderland<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (52.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another week, another hair pull incident. And a second one on Tolu Arokodare this season. This time Dan Ballard was the man caught, and he&#8217;ll miss the rest of the season through suspension. It was another aerial battle as the pair contested a long ball from the goalkeeper. Ballard had his arms around Arokodare but also a hold of the Wolves&#8217; striker&#8217;s hair &#8212; who went down before getting up to play on. It was missed by the referee but caught by VAR, advising a red card for violent conduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-bournemouth-s-penalty-fair\">Was Bournemouth&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Bournemouth 3-0 Crystal Palace<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (88.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bournemouth went 2-0 up against Crystal Palace through an Eli Junior Kroupi penalty. It was awarded on the pitch when Marcos Senesi went down inside the box, trying to get a ball spilled by Dean Henderson. The Crystal Palace goalkeeper was adjudged to have brought Senesi down, and the penalty was given pretty quickly. It was checked and confirmed by VAR, who found no clear and obvious error. But the replays showed little to no contact on Senesi by Henderson, causing frustration among Palace fans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-benjamin-sesko-handle-the-ball\">Did Benjamin Sesko handle the ball?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man Utd 3-2 Liverpool<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (61%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There have been many handball calls this season, and the rules are cut and dry when it comes to goals. If a goalscorer handles the ball, even accidently, immediately before scoring then the goal has to be ruled out. Benjamin Sesko bundled the ball into the back of the net to make it 2-0 to Man Utd against Liverpool at Old Trafford, after Freddie Woodman&#8217;s pushed Bryan Mbeumo&#8217;s cross into him. The ball hit Sesko&#8217;s chest and then went over the line. It was checked, as all goals are, with a suspicion of handball. VAR checked and confirmed the on-pitch decision of a goal, but Liverpool fans weren&#8217;t happy. Replays later showed that the ball had brushed Sesko&#8217;s fingertips, seen by the change in spin, which sent it towards goal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw34-var-controveries\">GW34 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were three controversial calls in a shortened Gameweek 34, but all three were voted to be errors. That includes what could be a crucial decision in the relegation battle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-andre-lucky-to-avoid-red\">Was Andre lucky to avoid red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Wolves 0-1 Tottenham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (58.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tottenham finally got their first league win of 2026 against Wolves, but they were made to work hard for it. It might have been easier, had Andre been sent off for a challenge just before half-time. The Brazilian contested a loose ball with Yves Bissouma, but went it hard. A foul was awarded, and Andre booked. But replays showed Andre can go in two-footed, catching Bissouma on the ankle. The decision of a yellow card was upheld, though.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-everton-have-had-a-late-penalty\">Should Everton have had a late penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>West Ham 2-1 Everton<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (60.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">How crucial this could be. West Ham beat Everton late on at the London Stadium, but could have lost if a penalty had been given. Mateus Fernandes was challenging with Thierno Barry for the ball, standing behind the Everton man. He put his arms through Barry&#8217;s, in a sort of backwards hug. But, in doing so, Fernandes punched the ball with his hand out of play. Everton appealed for a penalty, but it was deemed accidental by VAR. David Moyes wasn&#8217;t happy with the decision, or the &#8216;accidental&#8217; reasoning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-nick-pope-deserve-a-red\">Did Nick Pope deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Arsenal 1-0 Newcastle<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (57.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arsenal wanted Newcastle reduced to 10 men after Nick Pope brought Viktor Gyokeres down well outside his area. Gyokeres had been chasing a long ball over the top, pushing wide, with Pope looking to intercept. The Newcastle man had missed his clearance, though, and brought Gyokeres down with his arm &#8212; though the Swede had also run in the Magpies&#8217; goalkeeper. Pope was booked, but Arsenal fans weren&#8217;t happy. They felt that Pope had denied a clear and obvious goalscoring opportunity. But VAR disagreed. Malick Thiaw looked to be in a good position to get the ball ahead of Gyokeres, who was also moving away from goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw33-var-controveries\">GW33 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was a busy week in terms of fixtures, but it wasn&#8217;t filled with VAR controversies. It wasn&#8217;t completely empty, though, including a big talking point in Man City&#8217;s win over Arsenal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-haaland-s-winner-have-stood\">Should Haaland&#8217;s winner have stood?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man City 2-1 Arsenal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (59.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first of two decisions involving Erling Haaland and Gabriel. This one hasn&#8217;t had as much interest as the second incident, but it was the more important call of the match. Erling Haaland put Man City 2-1 up midway through the second half, getting onto the end of the ball following a tussle with Gabriel. There weren&#8217;t many appeals against the goal standing, but replays showed Haaland had hold of Gabriel&#8217;s shirt. VAR reviewed the decision and the goal stood, with Gabriel and Haaland both holding each other. A physical battle, this isn&#8217;t a goal you really want to see disallowed, unless you&#8217;re on the receiving end of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-gabriel-deserve-a-red-card\">Did Gabriel deserve a red card?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man City 2-1 Arsenal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (67.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tempers were flaring late on, and Haaland and Gabriel clashed once more. Haaland wasn&#8217;t happy with a foul committed by Gabriel in the middle of the pitch, with a free-kick awarded to Man City. The pair squared up and put their heads against each other, before Gabriel made a forward motion with his. Haaland did not react, but it started a mini brawl. Both players were booked, but Gabriel&#8217;s action was checked by VAR for violent conduct. Fans were screaming for a red, deeming it to have been a headbutt. But a yellow card was deemed sufficient, as the action was not seen as &#8220;excessively aggressive or violent&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I think it&#8217;s a red card,&#8221; Haaland said after the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I think most agree with me. If I go down like any other guy, it&#8217;s a red card. It&#8217;s not something I would do. My father taught me to stay on your feet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;That&#8217;s the reality. Should I have gone down? Maybe. Then it would&#8217;ve been easier. But I didn&#8217;t and I got a yellow card. I don&#8217;t know why.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw32-var-controversies\">GW32 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Welcome back to the Premier League! England&#8217;s top flight made its return from a longer international and FA Cup break with four contentious decisions. They were spread across four different games, and included another hair pull discussion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-arsenal-s-penalty-fair\">Was Arsenal&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Arsenal 1-2 Bournemouth<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> No penalty (61.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arsenal struggled in their defeat to Bournemouth but they got the chance to equalise in the first half from the penalty spot. Ryan Christie was penalised for handball in the box, and the referee&#8217;s decision was pretty instant. But Christie and his Bournemouth teammates protested. They felt the ball had hit his arm from close proximity, and that the decision should have been overturned. But VAR agreed with the on-pitch decision of penalty, as Christie&#8217;s arm was so far away from his body, over his head.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-beto-s-goal-have-counted\">Should Beto&#8217;s goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Brentford 2-2 Everton<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> Goal (100%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton twice came from behind to secure a point against Brentford. But the Bees weren&#8217;t happy with their first. Beto scored from close range after Jake O&#8217;Brien had initially won the ball on the byline. The Irishman had contested with Keane Lewis-Potter for the ball, with the Brentford man looking to shield the ball and shepherd it out for a goalkick. O&#8217;Brien had his arms around Lewis-Potter, who went down, but nothing was given. The goal was allowed to stand, and the challenge not deemed a foul. While Lewis-Potter did go down, it was more a case of him leaning into O&#8217;Brien who then moved away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-tottenham-s-penalty-rightly-overturned\">Was Tottenham&#8217;s penalty rightly overturned?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Sunderland 1-0 Tottenham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> No penalty (75.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tottenham were awarded a penalty midway through the first half against Sunderland, after Randal Kolo Muani was brought down in the box. He was tackled by Omar Alderete, who was deemed to have fouled him. Luke O&#8217;Nien had also gone in to challenge Kolo Muani, so a penalty seemed certain. But it was checked by VAR who recommended an on-pitch review to overturn the decision. Replays showed that Alderete had got a slight touch on the ball before connecting with Kolo Muani.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-lisandro-martinez-have-been-sent-off\">Should Lisandro Martinez have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Man Utd 1-2 Leeds<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> No red card (54.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another hair pull decision, which was initially missed by the referee. Lisandro Martinez was penalised for grabbing hold of Dominic Calvert-Lewin&#8217;s hair when contesting an aerial battle. As all hair pulls are, the action was deemed violent conduct, and Martinez was sent off after an on-field review. But it restarted conversations about the severity of hair pulls, as Man Utd felt it was soft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The arm [is] in the face of Lisandro and he is off balance and grappling. He goes to touch his shirt and gets a red card for it,&#8221; Michael Carrick said after the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;It is not aggressive, there is no jolt, no tug. We have got to be careful where the game is going. It is a shocking decision, absolutely shocking. The red card, that is really concerning. I know he touched his hair. There is a difference to really aggressively touching it.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw31-var-controversies\">GW31 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 31 offered up another few dubious VAR decisions. There were four in total, with two appearing in Friday&#8217;s clash between Bournemouth and Manchester United, and another two occurring during Saturday&#8217;s fixtures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-man-utd-denied-a-penalty\">Were Man Utd denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Bournemouth 2-2 Man Utd<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> Penalty (70.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first of two incidents at the Vitality Stadium was a big one. Man Utd wanted a penalty for a shirt pull and subsequent two-handed push inside the box on Amad Diallo. Nothing was given on the pitch and Bournemouth went up the other end to score through Ryan Christie. VAR obviously went back to look at the challenge but deemed that any contact was not sufficient for a foul. So Man Utd did not get the penalty <em>and<\/em> Bournemouth&#8217;s equaliser counted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-harry-maguire-rightly-sent-off\">Was Harry Maguire rightly sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Bournemouth 2-2 Man Utd<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> Red card (69.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second incident in Bournemouth&#8217;s draw with Man Utd also came in the Cherries&#8217; favour. Bournemouth were awarded a penalty after Evanilson went down in the box under a challenge from Harry Maguire. But Maguire was also shown a straight red card. The Englishman was deemed to have not made an attempt to win the ball, pushing Evanilson over. Man Utd fans were upset as it felt similar to their penalty not given. But there were also some calling a red card too harsh. But VAR agreed with the onfield decision, calling it a denial of a goalscoring opportunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-burnley-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Burnley have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Fulham 3-1 Burnley<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> Penalty (57.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Burnley wanted an early penalty against Fulham after the ball hit Calvin Bassey&#8217;s arm in the box, but play was waved on. VAR looked at the decision and backed up the referee, deeming the ball to have hit Bassey&#8217;s supporting arm. Replays showed that Bassey&#8217;s arm wasn&#8217;t on the floor, so some felt that the arm couldn&#8217;t be counted as supporting at that time. But Ifab&#8217;s handball laws do not mention anything about touching the ground &#8211; just that it is between their body and the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-a-dangerous-jack-hinshelwood-challenge-go-unpunished\">Did a dangerous Jack Hinshelwood challenge go unpunished?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result:<\/strong> Brighton 2-1 Liverpool<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision:<\/strong> No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> Red card (65.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both Curtis Jones and Liverpool fans were left furious after Brighton&#8217;s Jack Hinshelwood caught the midfielder on the leg with a reckless studs-up challenge in the second half. Jones was forced to leave the field for treatment, however, no VAR check seemed to take place. Nor was there even a free-kick awarded for the foul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw30-var-controversies\">GW30 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Premier League returned after the FA Cup fifth round and there were a few contentious decisions. All three were penalty calls, with two coming in Chelsea&#8217;s defeat to Newcastle United.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-newcastle-have-had-a-penalty\">Should Newcastle have had a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Chelsea 0-1 Newcastle<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (60.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were two penalty calls in Chelsea&#8217;s defeat to Newcastle, though neither were given. The first went against Newcastle, with Malick Thiaw going down in the box. The German defender had been tussling with Reece James from a corner before going down. Replays showed that James hadn&#8217;t been looking at the ball when Thiaw went down, focusing solely on his battle with the German. It&#8217;s something we&#8217;ve seen more often this season. But the referee did not feel it was a penalty, and VAR agreed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-cole-palmer-fouled-in-the-box\">Was Cole Palmer fouled in the box?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Chelsea 0-1 Newcastle<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (63.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second penalty call went against Chelsea, in the second half at Stamford Bridge. Cole Palmer had the ball and was by the byline before being tackled by Nick Woltemade. The Englishman went down and immediately appealed for a penalty, but his protests were waved away. VAR agreed with the referee&#8217;s decision, though replays showed there was contact. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-arsenal-denied-a-penalty\">Were Arsenal denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Arsenal 2-0 Everton<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (66.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arsenal eventually ran out comfortable winners against Everton, but they felt they deserved a first-half penalty which could have made things much easier. Kai Havertz went down in the box having tried to get space to shoot, with Michael Keane challenging him. It looked dramatic at the time, and Jordan Pickford immediately accused Havertz of diving. The German wasn&#8217;t booked for simulation, but no penalty was given. Replays showed that Keane had caught Havertz&#8217;s back foot, though VAR deemed the contact to be minimal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw29-var-controversies\">GW29 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The midweek gameweek brought four contentious decisions, with all four being penalty calls. That includes what could be a pretty big one in the Premier League title race.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-leeds-denied-a-penalty\">Were Leeds denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Leeds 0-1 Sunderland<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (73.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Leeds&#8217; defeat to Sunderland was decided by a second-half penalty. But Daniel Farke&#8217;s side feel like they should have had a spot-kick of their own in the first half. Pascal Struijk went down in the box under a challenge from Luke O&#8217;Nien as a corner came in. It didn&#8217;t get too much attention as the ball didn&#8217;t reach their spot, but Struijk appealed. Replays showed that O&#8217;Nien did indeed bring Struijk down, grabbing him around the neck with both arms. But the referee didn&#8217;t give anything and VAR agreed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-marcus-tavernier-fouled-in-the-box\">Was Marcus Tavernier fouled in the box?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Bournemouth 0-0 Brentford<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (52.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Just after half-time, Bournemouth felt like they deserved a chance to break the deadlock against Brentford. As a cross came into the box, Marcus Tavernier stretched to reach the ball but just missed. It looked like he had simply been unable to get onto the end of the cross, but the Bournemouth man appealed for a penalty. Replays initially looked unclear but Tavernier did appear to be caught on the back of his leg by the Bournemouth defender. It was slight, but definitely enough to impede Tavernier. However, nothing was given.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-west-ham-deserve-a-penalty\">Did West Ham deserve a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Fulham 0-1 West Ham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (58.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This didn&#8217;t end up influencing the result, but goal difference could be key in the relegation battle. And West Ham may rue not getting a first-half penalty for a handball by Alex Iwobi. The Fulham man blocked a corner into the box at the near post, sending it for another corner. He appeared to lean into the ball with his shoulder, and West Ham&#8217;s players appealed for a penalty. It was checked by VAR and replays showed that the ball had hit him on the arm. But it may have been high enough up &#8212; on the t-shirt line &#8212; to save Iwobi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-brighton-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Brighton have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Brighton 0-1 Arsenal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (57.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brighton wanted a penalty in their game against Arsenal just before half-time. As a cross came into the box, Mats Wieffer and Gabriel Martinelli found themselves on the floor &#8212; long before the ball had reached them. The duo had been tussling on the edge of the area when the ball was still on the wing and Wieffer looked to be breaking through. Martinelli had hold of Wieffer as he went down, but nothing was given. It was checked by VAR, who deemed there was no clear and obvious error by the referee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw28-var-controveries\">GW28 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was a busy gameweek with six contentious decisions, including two in Bournemouth&#8217;s 1-1 draw with Sunderland. There was also a controversial moment in Arsenal&#8217;s win over Chelsea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-sunderland-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Sunderland have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Bournemouth 1-1 Sunderland<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (63.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The VAR discussions started just three minutes into the gameweek with Sunderland&#8217;s trip to Bournemouth. Enzo Le Fee went down in the box when trying to get a shot away, under a challenge from Alex Jimenez. The Bournemouth defender had pushed Le Fee in the back, putting the Sunderland man off. Nothing was given on the pitch and the decision was backed up by VAR. The push was deemed &#8220;normal contact&#8221; which annoyed a lot of fans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-tyler-adams-deserve-a-red\">Did Tyler Adams deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Bournemouth 1-1 Sunderland<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (58.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another decision that Sunderland felt went against them. The Black Cats won a free-kick for a foul from Tyler Adams on Granit Xhaka, and the Bournemouth man was booked. The foul was checked by VAR as Adams had caught Xhaka on the ankle with his studs. It wasn&#8217;t a good one to look back at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the tackle was only deemed reckless, so a yellow sufficed. VAR also took into account the fact that Adams had been pushed while making the tackle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-burnley-s-equaliser-fairly-ruled-out\">Was Burnley&#8217;s equaliser fairly ruled out?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Burnley 3-4 Brentford<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (65.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Burnley had two disallowed goals against Brentford. One to potentially make it 4-3, and another to deny them a late draw. The first was for a tight offside call, only caught by VAR. The second was for handball, and it was another VAR overturn. Ashley Barnes was the scorer, with a lovely finish from inside the box. It looked like a perfectly good goal but, as always, it was checked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The check took a long time &#8212; the biggest complaint of the decision &#8212; and replays showed that the ball had brushed Barnes&#8217; hand. Although accidental, as it had directly led to Barnes scoring, the goal had to be disallowed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-tottenham-on-the-wrong-end-of-another-push-decision\">Were Tottenham on the wrong end of another push decision?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Fulham 2-1 Tottenham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (55.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tottenham fans felt aggrieved when Randal Kolo Muani had a second goal disallowed (by the referee) for a slight push on Gabriel in the north London derby defeat to Arsenal. This time, they were annoyed that a Fulham goal wasn&#8217;t disallowed for a push. Tottenham&#8217;s complaints were for a foul from Raul Jimenez on Radu Dragusin as the ball initially came into the box.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jimenez got his head onto the ball, knocking it on. It was then played back across goal and scored by Harry Wilson, with Dragusin on the floor. The goal was checked and cleared by VAR, with the push not deemed to have met the threshold for a foul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-maxence-lacroix-foul-matheus-cunha-in-the-box\">Did Maxence Lacroix foul Matheus Cunha in the box?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man Utd 2-1 Crystal Palace<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (63.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd were awarded a penalty early into the second half for a foul from Maxence Lacroix on Matheus Cunha. The Brazilian had been racing into the box, trying to get on the end of a pass. There was very little delay in the referee pointing to the spot. The decision was checked by VAR, first for a penalty and then a red card.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Replays showed that a lot of the foul had happened outside the box, though Cunha went down inside. Lacroix looked to have stopped the foul as the pair entered the box, though which blade of grass they were on was unclear. A penalty was confirmed, and a red card recommended for the denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Oliver Glasner conceded that while a red card was the correct decision, he was not sure about the penalty call.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-declan-rice-handle-the-ball\">Did Declan Rice handle the ball?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Arsenal 2-1 Chelsea<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (69.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea were applying pressure from corners against Arsenal. One delivery just before half-time caused problems, with Declan Rice battling Jorrel Hato at the front post. The ball was cleared out for another corner by Rice. But Chelsea fans wanted a penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rice had used his arm to clear the ball, with it hitting just above his elbow. The Englishman looked to have moved his arm towards the ball too, making a deliberate attempt. But as he was challenging an opponent for the ball, Rice avoided the handball decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw27-var-controveries\">GW27 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 27 was a quiet one for controversies. But there were still a couple. And one came in the north London derby, bringing a lot of discussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-alexis-mac-allister-s-first-goal-rightly-disallowed\">Was Alexis Mac Allister&#8217;s first goal rightly disallowed?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Nottingham Forest 0-1 Liverpool<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (60.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Alexis Mac Allister scored the late winner for Liverpool against Nottingham Forest. But he thought he had nabbed it slightly earlier. The Argentine had thrown himself in front of an attempted clearance by Ola Aina, with the ball rebounding off him and going into the back of the net. The referee gave a goal, and there weren&#8217;t any complaints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the goal was checked by VAR, as all are. And they found that the ball had hit Mac Allister on the elbow before going in. Although his arm was tucked in, and the handball was absolutely accidental, as he was the goalscorer the decision was basic. Did the ball touch his arm? If so, then the goal had to be disallowed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-randal-kolo-muani-have-a-second-goal-wrongly-disallowed\">Did Randal Kolo Muani have a second goal wrongly disallowed?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Tottenham 1-4 Arsenal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (54.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Randal Kolo Muani got Tottenham&#8217;s first-half equaliser against Arsenal. And he thought he had scored their second after the break. But it was very short-lived. Conor Gallagher&#8217;s ball into the box found its way to Kolo Muani, who headed home. But the goal was immediately disallowed by the referee for a full. Kolo Muani had his arms on Gabriel, who threw himself to the floor <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Tottenham striker was penalised for a foul, though it appeared to be soft. VAR checked the call and upheld the decision, disallowing Kolo Muani&#8217;s goal. This feels like another case of the referee&#8217;s decision having the weight &#8212; as many feel it should. If the referee had initially allowed the goal, Tottenham may have got their equaliser.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw26-var-controversies\">GW26 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 26 brought another handful of controversies, with the biggest Tammy Abraham being denied a penalty against Brighton &#8212; while Phil Foden was perhaps lucky to escape a red card against Fulham.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-leeds-second-goal-have-stood\">Should Leeds&#8217; second goal have stood?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Chelsea 2-2 Leeds<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (55.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ball appeared to hit Jayden Bogle&#8217;s arm as he moved toward the Chelsea box in the build-up to Leeds&#8217; equalising goal at Stamford Bridge. After a scramble in the area, Noah Okafor slotted into an empty net, with a VAR review later showing the ball only struck Bogle&#8217;s arm via his thigh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-kenny-tete-have-been-punished-for-hair-pull\">Should Kenny Tete have been punished for hair pull?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man City 3-0 Fulham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (52.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A potential hair pull by Fulham defender Kenny Tete on Antoine Semenyo went unpunished, even after VAR review. However, replays appeared to show Tete attempting to grip Semenyo&#8217;s hair, which is an offence that has previously been punished with a red card in the Premier League.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-phil-foden-have-been-sent-off\">Should Phil Foden have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Man City 3-0 Fulham<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (89.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Phil Foden was shown a yellow card for a foul on Calvin Bassey. Replays showed that Foden had caught Bassey high on his Achilles with his studs. It brought comparisons to Cristian Romero\u2019s red card against Man Utd &#8212; but no red card was shown, with the original decision of yellow card upheld and Foden remaining on the pitch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-aston-villa-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Aston Villa have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: <\/strong>Aston Villa 1-0 Brighton<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (66.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aston Villa wanted a penalty after Tammy Abraham went down in the box. The striker had been pushed with both hands by Brighton centre-back Olivier Boscagli as he attempted to take a shot. But nothing was given after VAR review. Villa still went on to seal a 1-0 win in the match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw25-var-controversies\">GW25 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The biggest VAR talking point came in Man City&#8217;s 2-1 win over Liverpool at Anfield. But it wasn&#8217;t the only contentious decision of Gameweek 25.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-sergio-romero-deserve-a-red\">Did Sergio Romero deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 2-0 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (79.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tottenham shot themselves in the foot at Old Trafford, with Cristian Romero the guilty party. The Tottenham captain was set off for a bad challenge on Casemiro, a decision made by the referee. It was checked and confirmed by VAR, with Romero deemed to have used excessive force that endangered the opponent. There weren&#8217;t many complaints across the board for this one, though Tottenham fans felt Romero was refereed on reputation rather than the incident itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-brentford-have-got-an-early-penalty\">Should Brentford have got an early penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 2-3 Brentford<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (66.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brentford won a thrilling game against Newcastle at St James&#8217; Park, coming from behind. But they wanted an opportunity to go ahead within minutes of kick-off. Keane Lewis-Potter had gone down in the box as he chased a poor defensive header back. Kieran Trippier was tracking him and had hold of Lewis-Potter&#8217;s shirt. Nothing was given by the referee and this was backed up by VAR. They deemed the contact was &#8216;minimal with no impact&#8217; which did not go down well with Newcastle fans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-man-city-s-third-goal-have-been-allowed-to-stand\">Should Man City&#8217;s third goal have been allowed to stand?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 1-2 Man City<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (51.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now this was essentially two VAR decisions in one. And so we&#8217;ve included them together as one vote. Liverpool had committed everyone forward for a late set-piece, seeking an equaliser. It came to nothing and Man City broke, with Rayan Cherki playing a low ball towards the open net. Erling Haaland and Dominik Szoboszlai were both chasing it and battling each other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Szoboszlai tried to pull Haaland back but Craig Pawson waved play on, to see what happened with the move. The Liverpool man had gained a slight advantage after the pull, which forced Haaland&#8217;s hand in dragging Szoboszlai down. As he did that, the ball went into the net without a touch from either player. Pawson looked to have allowed the goal, much to Szoboszlai&#8217;s protests, with the Hungarian looking likely to clear the ball before the contact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision was checked by VAR and the goal ruled out for the foul by Haaland. But play was then brought back for Szoboszlai&#8217;s initial foul, and the Liverpool man was sent off for DOGSO. It was a correct call by the letter of the law, but a lot of fans and players felt it was common sense for the goal to have just been allowed. Given the vote, this was technically an error for and against both sides.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw24-var-controversies\">GW24 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 24 brought a variety of VAR controversies, from penalty calls to subjective offsides, fouls and penalties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-dominic-solanke-foul-marc-guehi\">Did Dominic Solanke foul Marc Guehi?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 2-2 Man City<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (54.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dominic Solanke started Tottenham&#8217;s comeback against Man City with a goal that was contested in more than one way. The first was whether it was actually his, or an own goal from Marc Guehi. Guehi appeared to have put the ball in his own net under pressure from Solanke. The second was whether Solanke had actually fouled Guehi to force the own goal, kicking the Man City defender&#8217;s foot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Solanke was deemed to have played the ball rather than the man, which was backed up by VAR. So the goal stood and was officially awarded to Solanke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-aston-villa-s-equaliser-rightly-disallowed\">Was Aston Villa&#8217;s equaliser rightly disallowed?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 0-1 Brentford<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (73.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tammy Abraham thought he had made a dream return to Aston Villa in equalising against Brentford. But his joy was short-lived. After a lengthy VAR review, the goal was disallowed as the ball had gone out of play at the start of the move. While some Aston Villa fans remain adamant that it was inconclusive, replays did look pretty clear that Leon Bailey had failed to keep the ball in play under pressure from Rico Henry. The more controversial point was that the ball had gone out of play at the other end of the pitch. Some weren&#8217;t happy with play going so far back to disallow the goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-var-right-to-award-man-utd-a-free-kick\">Was VAR right to award Man Utd a free-kick?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 3-2 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision:<\/strong> Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (63.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd were awarded an early penalty in their win over Fulham. Jorge Cuenca looked to have brought Matheus Cunha down in the box. As always, it was checked by VAR, which brought the controversy. Cuenca was deemed not to have fouled Cunha in the box, ruling out the penalty. But Man Utd were awarded a free-kick &#8212; from which they scored. The free-kick was awarded as there had been a foul outside the box, with Cuenca pulling Cunha&#8217;s shirt. And the free-kick was awarded by the referee, not VAR, who was well within his rights to do so per the laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-james-tarkowski-interfere-with-play\">Did James Tarkowski interfere with play?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brighton 1-1 Everton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (70.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton stole a point from Brighton thanks to Beto&#8217;s last-gasp equaliser. But Brighton wanted the goal disallowed for offside. This was another subjective call, and they seem to be more frequent this season. James Tarkowski was the one being checked, for potentially interfering with Bart Verbruggen&#8217;s ability to make a save. Tarkowski looked to have been in Verbruggen&#8217;s eyeline as an initial shot went in &#8212; which was parried out by the goalkeeper into Beto&#8217;s path. But as Tarkowski hadn&#8217;t made any attempt to play the ball himself, the goal was allowed to stand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw23-var-controversies\">GW23 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were three VAR controversies in the Premier League for Gameweek 23, with two in Chelsea&#8217;s away win over Crystal Palace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-man-city-have-had-a-penalty\">Should Man City have had a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man City 2-0 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (53.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now this was an interesting one to start the weekend. Man City wanted a penalty for handball on Yerson Mosquera. The Wolves defender had blocked a cross with an outstretched arm, but nothing was given by the referee. Farai Hallam was refereeing his first ever game in the Premier League. The decision was checked by VAR who recommended a review for handball, believing Mosquera&#8217;s arm to have been too far away from his body. But, upon reviewing the footage himself, Hallam stuck with his initial decision &#8212; deeming the arm to be in a natural position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-pedro-neto-avoid-a-red-card\">Did Pedro Neto avoid a red card?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Crystal Palace 1-3 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (57.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It&#8217;s unclear whether this one was actually reviewed. But there were calls for it to be looked at. Ismaila Sarr had been fouled by Moises Caicedo, who was penalised &#8212; with Palace fans and players wanting a second yellow card. As Sarr went down, he almost collided with Pedro Neto, who had to leap over the Palace man. But as he did, Neto appeared to have stuck his left leg back to stamp on Sarr as he landed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-chelsea-s-penalty-fair\">Was Chelsea&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Crystal Palace 1-3 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (56%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea appealed for a penalty when Joao Pedro&#8217;s goalbound shot hit Jaydee Canvot on the arm. The Crystal Palace man&#8217;s arm had been by his side, but protests were made that the ball would have gone into the back of the net if it hadn&#8217;t have hit him. It was reviewed by VAR, who recommended a penalty for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Referee Darren England took some time at the screen, eventually giving the spot-kick. But many fans were unhappy with the decision, given Canvot&#8217;s arm was close to his body.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A few different rules were pulled up here. Chelsea fans were quoting the DOGSO rule, which was also utilised by the Premier League in their explanation. But VAR and football rules expert Dale Johnson <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DaleJohnsonBBC\/status\/2015498798076674197\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">highlighted<\/a> handball rules, which state that an accidental handball &#8212; in which the arm in close to the side of the body &#8212; that stops the ball from going in the goal should not be given as a handball offence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw22-var-controversies\">GW22 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Premier League returned after a break for the FA Cup third round, and VAR was put to work. There were a few controversies across Gameweek 22 including two penalty calls &#8212; one given, and one not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-diogo-dalot-have-been-sent-off\">Should Diogo Dalot have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 2-0 Man City<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (68.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was a controversial call just 10 minutes into the Manchester derby at Old Trafford. As Jeremy Doku rang down the wing, he was caught by a tough challenge from Diogo Dalot. The Man Utd man caught Doku just under the knee with his studs. Although the contact wasn&#8217;t full-on, many wanted a red card shown. But Dalot was only booked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, who deemed Dalot&#8217;s contact only glancing. But fans brought up Xavi Simons&#8217; red card against Liverpool earlier in the season, for a foul which was very similar. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even Roy Keane thought it should have been a red card. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-arsenal-deserve-a-penalty\">Did Arsenal deserve a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Nottingham Forest 0-0 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (52.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arsenal were held to a goalless draw against Nottingham Forest. But they feel they should have had a chance of taking a late lead. The Gunners wanted a penalty for handball by Ola Aina, as he tried to keep the ball in play in the box. The defender looked to have deliberately used his arm to nudge the ball away from the line. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nothing was given on the pitch but, of course, it was checked by VAR. They agreed with the original call, deeming Aina&#8217;s arm to have been in a natural position. VAR also believed that the ball had come off Aina&#8217;s shoulder first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-o-brien-s-goal-rightly-disallowed\">Was O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s goal rightly disallowed?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 0-1 Everton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (58.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It feels as though subjective offside calls have been more prevalent this season. Everton felt they were victim of a bad one against Aston Villa. The Toffees thought they had taken a first-half lead through Jake O&#8217;Brien, who headed in from a corner. But it was ruled out for offside. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Harrison Armstrong was deemed to have interfered with play from an offside position. Armstrong had challenged Emiliano Buendia for the ball, impacting his ability to play the ball &#8212; with his hands on the Villa man. The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, but Everton fans felt aggrieved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-var-right-to-recommend-bournemouth-penalty\">Was VAR right to recommend Bournemouth penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brighton 1-1 Bournemouth<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (52.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When Amine Adli went down in the box after a challenge with Bart Verbruggen, he thought he had won a penalty. The whistle went, but Adli was actually booked for simulation, with Brighton awarded a free-kick. The drama didn&#8217;t end there, though. It was checked by VAR and recommended for a review. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Replays didn&#8217;t appear to be clear enough to see an obvious error made by the referee. But he checked at the screen and overturned his initial decision, awarding a penalty to Bournemouth. Verbruggen was deemed to have fouled Adli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw21-var-controversies\">GW21 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After a week of non-action, Gameweek 21 made sure there were VAR controversies aplenty. There were six in total, spread across five games. Newcastle&#8217;s dramatic 4-3 win over Leeds included two, with a controversial penalty call for each side.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-nottingham-forest-s-penalty-fair\">Was Nottingham Forest&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: West Ham 1-2 Nottingham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (69.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first match of the gameweek ended with a controversial call. Morgan Gibbs-White converted a penalty that he won, after VAR intervention. Nottingham Forest had a late free-kick which was sent into the box and headed clear. But Alphonse Areola had collided with Gibbs-White. Nothing was given by the referee, but it was checked by VAR. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Replays showed that Areola had attempted to punch the ball clear, but missed and connected with Gibbs-White. The Forest man had no chance of winning the ball as it had already been headed clear. But it was deemed a foul by VAR, who recommended a review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-cucurella-have-conceded-a-penalty\">Should Cucurella have conceded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 2-1 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (87.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea&#8217;s win over Fulham earlier in the season brought one of the most controversial VAR moments of the campaign. There was another call to be made in the return fixture, which Fulham won. But it was a lot less controversial. Marc Cucurella was rightly sent off for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. The Chelsea defence was beaten by a long ball over the top, with Cucurella and Harry Wilson tussling. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cucurella dragged Wilson down just as the Welshman was heading into the box. A red card and free-kick was awarded almost immediately. But as Wilson was so close to the box, falling into it, there was a VAR check for a penalty. Replays did appear to show that the holding offence had in fact continued into the box, ever so slightly. But that was not the decision of VAR, who deemed a free-kick to be the right call alongside the red card.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-man-utd-unfairly-denied-a-goal\">Were Man Utd unfairly denied a goal?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Burnley 2-2 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (51.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd through they had scored a first-half equaliser in their eventual draw with Burnley. Lisandro Martinez was the man to finish the opportunity, after a bit of a scramble in the box following a corner. But it was immediately ruled out by the referee for a foul. Martinez was the one penalised after bringing down Kyle Walker as the corner came in, shortly before he scored. The referee had waited for the move to play out before blowing his whistle, avoiding a more controversial call. His decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, even though some fans felt that Walker went down a bit too easily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-michael-keane-s-red-card-harsh\">Was Michael Keane&#8217;s red card harsh?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Everton 1-1 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (68%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton were reduced to nine men during their draw with Wolves, with both red cards coming late on. The first went to Michael Keane, for violent conduct, but it wasn&#8217;t a decision that went down well. Keane had challenged for an aerial ball with Tolu Arokodare, losing the battle. Nothing off-hand appearaed to have happened, but the incident was checked by VAR. Replays showed that Keane had pulled Arokodare&#8217;s hair when challenging for the ball, which is an immediate red card for violent conduct. But many fans felt it was harsh, with the pulling minor and without ill intent. Everton also appealed the decision, but it was swiftly rejected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-leeds-penalty-fair\">Was Leeds&#8217; penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 4-3 Leeds<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (55.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were two penalty calls at St James&#8217; Park. Both were for handball, and both were given. The first went Leeds&#8217; way for an infringement by Malick Thiaw. The ball had hit the Newcastle defender&#8217;s arm as he fell to the ground in the box, challenging Dominic Calvert-Lewin for a cross. A penalty was awarded almost immediately, and the decision was backed up by VAR. But Thiaw felt that he had been fouled by Calvert-Lewin, with a push leading to the handball.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-newcastle-s-penalty-fair\">Was Newcastle&#8217;s penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 4-3 Leeds<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (65.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second penalty went to Newcastle late on. Brenden Aaronson was the one to handle the ball, blocking an incoming cross with his arm. Again a penalty was the immediate call by the referee. Some felt the decision was a bit harsh, as Aaronson was turning his body away from the cross, with his arm outstretched. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOf course, the whole home crowd was asking for it and he was happy to give it really quick,&#8221; Leeds boss Daniel Farke said after the game. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Yeah, it&#8217;s tough, because for me it&#8217;s never in the sense of the game to give a handball for such a situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Aaronson has no intention to play the ball with the hand, no intention to make his body bigger. He&#8217;s just hit by the ball from three yards.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw20-var-controveries\">GW20 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was some talking points in Gameweek 20, all surrounding offsides and the tolerance level of the lines. But those offsides were still black-and-white in terms of the rules, with no subjectivity coming into play. So there were no VAR decisions or errors to debate for the week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw19-var-controversies\">GW19 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We reached the midway point of the season with a relatively quiet gameweek. There were just two controversial calls, one on the final gameday of 2025, and one on the first day of 2026. And they both involved London clubs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-var-right-to-award-chelsea-a-penalty\">Was VAR right to award Chelsea a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 2-2 Bournemouth<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: Penalty (61.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea wanted a penalty early in their game against Bournemouth as Estevao went down in the box under a challenge from Antoine Semenyo. But referee Samuel Barrott did not award anything. VAR checked the decision and recommended a review for a penalty. The spot-kick was eventually given, with Semenyo deemed to have tripped Estevao &#8212; enough to award a penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-cristian-romero-have-been-sent-off\">Should Cristian Romero have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 0-0 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: Red card (62.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brentford wanted a free-kick and a red card shown to Cristian Romero after Igor Thiago fell when bearing down on goal. He was challenged by Romero, who looked to play the ball and missed, with Thiago going down after. But nothing was given on the pitch, not even a foul. The decision was checked by VAR, who deemed there to be no clear and obvious error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw18-var-controversies\">GW18 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After a hectic gameweek 17, gameweek 18 relatively quiet by comparison. Two decisions came in Saturday&#8217;s lunchtime kick off between Nottingham Forest and Manchester, while Manchester United&#8217;s welcome of Newcastle, Arsenal&#8217;s game against Brighton and Aston Villa&#8217;s trip to Chelsea also fall under the microscope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-newcastle-have-had-a-penalty-0\">Should Newcastle have had a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 1-0 Newcastle<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: No penalty (55.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle were denied a second half penalty after the ball looked to strike Lisandro Martinez&#8217;s arm. It was the second gameweek running that the Magpies saw a penalty appeal waved away after the VAR deemed that Martinez&#8217;s arm was in a natural position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-cherki-s-winner-have-stood\">Should Cherki&#8217;s winner have stood?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Nottingham Forest 1-2 Man City<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: Goal (52.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rayan Cherki fired Manchester City in front late on to land a 2-1 win over Nottingham Forest. However, Morgan Gibbs-White felt he was fouled when the ball was put into the box. His protests were waved away by VAR and the goal stood. It was a decision backed by former Man Utd striker Wayne Rooney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;If you look, Gibbs-White actually fouls (Nico) O\u2019Reilly first, he grabs his arm, locks it and then goes over looking for a foul,&#8221; he said on Match of the Day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;So no, I think this is a perfectly good goal scored by Manchester City.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-a-yellow-for-verbruggen-the-right-call\">Was a yellow for Verbruggen the right call?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Arsenal 2-1 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: No red card (66.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brighton goalkeeper Bart Verbruggen was given a yellow card after bringing down Arsenal striker Viktor Gyokeres. The Gunners felt the Seagulls stopper denied a goalscoring opportunity. The match officials, though, felt the striker was heading away from goal, and upheld the original decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-chelsea-unlucky-not-to-have-a-penalty\">Were Chelsea unlucky not to have a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 1-2 Aston Villa<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision<\/strong>: No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says<\/strong>: No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says<\/strong>: Penalty (50.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shortly after the break, Chelsea felt they should have had a penalty after the ball struck Ian Maatsen on the arm. Nothing was given on the pitch and the decision was backed up by VAR. Maatsen was deemed to have had his arm in a natural position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw17-var-controversies\">GW17 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 17 was a busy one, with seven major decisions being checked by the VAR, including two huge decisions in the draw between Newcastle and Chelsea. And a further two in Liverpool&#8217;s 2-1 victory against Tottenham.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-garnacho-lucky-to-only-see-yellow\">Was Garnacho lucky to only see yellow?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 2-2 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (50.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle wanted Chelsea reduced to 10 men in their game at St James&#8217; Park. Alejandro Garnacho caught Jacob Ramsey with a studs-up challenge in the first half. But he was only booked by Andy Madley. This decision was upheld by VAR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-trevoh-chalobah-foul-anthony-gordon\">Did Trevoh Chalobah foul Anthony Gordon?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 2-2 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (61.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Eddie Howe claimed Trevoh Chalobah\u2019s barge on Anthony Gordon was a \u201cstonewall\u201d penalty. It was checked, but VAR confirmed the on-field decision to not award a penalty. The contact was deemed to be \u201cside-to-side in a shielding action\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-dan-ballard-have-been-sent-off\">Should Dan Ballard have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brighton 0-0 Sunderland<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (59%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sunderland defender Dan Ballard followed through in a challenge with Brighton\u2019s Charalampos Kostoulas after a poor touch. The referee\u2019s on-field decision to give a yellow card was backed up by VAR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-simons-sending-off-justified\">Was Simons&#8217; sending off justified?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 1-2 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Yellow card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (58.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Xavi Simons was originally given a yellow card for a late challenge on fellow Dutchman Virgil van Dijk, but this was overturned after an on-field review with Simons sent off for serious foul play &#8211; a decision our X followers agreed with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-ekitike-foul-romero\">Did Ekitike foul Romero?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 1-2 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (58.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Spurs captain Cristian Romero wanted Liverpool\u2019s second goal of this game disallowed as he felt that the Reds\u2019 striker Hugo Ekitike had pushed him in the back. The goal was given after a VAR check.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-could-leeds-have-had-a-penalty\">Could Leeds have had a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Leeds 4-1 Crystal Palace<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says:<\/strong> No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (59.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Leeds supporters felt they should\u2019ve had a penalty during their home match with Crystal Palace after Tyrick Mitchell brought down Brenden Aaronson with the score still at 0-0 in the first-half.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-fulham-s-penalty-correctly-given\">Was Fulham&#8217;s penalty correctly given?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 1-0 Nottingham Forest<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says:<\/strong> Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (65.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The only goal from Monday Night Football came via the penalty spot after Kevin was felled in the box by Douglas Luiz. Some of the Forest players were protesting that the midfielder had won enough of the ball.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw16-var-controversies\">GW16 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 16 was slightly quieter than previous weeks, with just three decisions for our X followers to vote on this week. All three of those decisions were for potential red card checks too, so none of them have actually affected our final VAR-amended results from the Premier League weekend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-diego-gomez-have-seen-red\">Should Diego Gomez have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 2-0 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (60.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liverpool wanted a red card for Diego Gomez after a foul just before half-time. The Brighton man caught Florian Wirtz square in the chest with his studs up. But Gomez was only booked, with the tackle deemed not \u201cserious foul play\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-hwang-hee-chan-lucky-to-escape-with-a-yellow\">Was Hwang Hee-Chan lucky to escape with a yellow?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Arsenal 2-1 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (61.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hwang Hee-chan was booked for a foul on Myles Lewis-Skelly. He had gone hard into a tackle with his studs up, catching the Arsenal man on the foot. VAR checked it for a red card but were happy to stick with the initial decision.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-var-right-to-only-book-antoine-semenyo\">Was VAR right to only book Antoine Semenyo?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 4-4 Bournemouth<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (51.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Antoine Semenyo was booked after raising his hand to Diogo Dalot after the pair collided while competing for a high ball. Both players were booked by on-field referee Simon Hooper. VAR checked for a red card but stuck with Hooper\u2019s decision of a yellow for each player.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw15-var-controversies\">GW15 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 15 was as busy as they come, with seven decision bringing contention among fans and players alike. The seven incidents were spread out across six matches, too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-cristian-romero-have-seen-red\">Should Cristian Romero have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 2-0 Brentford<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (62.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brentford wanted to see Tottenham Hotspur down to 10 men in the first half of their match. Cristian Romero put in a strong tackle on Igor Thiago, coming from behind with a scissors motion. It looked to tick all the boxes for a red card, but the referee only booked Romero. The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, with the tackle deemed to have not met the threshold for serious foul play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-burnley-s-late-penalty-fair\">Was Burnley&#8217;s late penalty fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 2-1 Burnley<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (69.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Burnley wanted a late penalty for handball against Newcastle. Zian Flemming&#8217;s goal-bound flick was blocked in front of goal by Jacob Ramsey, but nothing was given. It was checked by VAR and a review recommended, with replays showing Ramsey had clearly moved his arm out to stop the shot. A penalty was given, but Ramsey was only booked for the handball denying &#8220;a promising attack&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-var-right-to-intervene-in-leeds-penalty-call\">Was VAR right to intervene in Leeds&#8217; penalty call?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Leeds 3-3 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (59.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was a lot of action in Leeds&#8217; 3-3 draw with Liverpool, so it&#8217;s no surprise to see VAR included in all of that. Leeds were given the chance to get back into the game with 20 minutes left to go, when they were awarded a penalty. But it only came after VAR review. Anthony Taylor had initially let Ibrahima Konate&#8217;s challenge on Wilfried Gnonto in the box go unpunished. But it was checked by VAR and deemed a careless challenge, while the ball was still in play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-brighton-s-equaliser-have-stood\">Should Brighton&#8217;s equaliser have stood?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brighton 1-1 West Ham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (59.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brighton stole a point from West Ham late on thanks to Georginio Rutter&#8217;s injury-time goal. But it was a very controversial moment. The ball had hit Rutter&#8217;s arm in the build up to the goal, before scoring. The laws on handball means that if a goalscorer handles the ball immediately before scoring, the goal will be ruled out regardless of whether the handball was deliberate or not. But, because Rutter had passed the ball before receiving it back to score, that particular law didn&#8217;t come into play. So it was decided on whether Rutter deliberately handled the ball, and it was deemed that he didn&#8217;t, with his arm in a natural position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I saw it, everybody saw it,&#8221; West Ham boss Nuno Espirito Santo said after the match. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;We cannot understand how they gave the goal. VAR saw it, everybody saw it.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-crystal-palace-denied-a-penalty\">Were Crystal Palace denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 1-2 Crystal Palace<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (60%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Crystal Palace wanted a penalty in their London derby against Fulham. Former Eagles defender Joachim Andersen had brought Nathaniel Clyne down on the edge of the Fulham box. But no foul was given. The decision was checked by VAR, and replays showed there to be clear contact &#8212; enough for Clyne to go down. The contact was on the line too, so would have cost Fulham a penalty. But VAR decided against recommending a review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-a-missed-penalty-for-man-utd\">A missed penalty for Man Utd?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Wolves 1-4 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (58.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first of two penalty calls in Man Utd&#8217;s win over Wolves came just before half-time. This one was against Emmanuel Agbadou, who blocked a goalbound shot with his arm. It was checked by VAR and the call of no penalty was confirmed. But replays showed that Agbadou had moved his arm towards the ball to block the shot. So Man Utd fans were justified in feeling a tad aggrieved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-this-penalty-overturn-correct\">Was this penalty overturn correct?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Wolves 1-4 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (76.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd were eventually given a penalty for handball late on. But this one wasn&#8217;t initially given either. Yerson Mosquera was the man to handle the ball in the box, in what seemed to be a similar incident to Agbadou&#8217;s. VAR checked the handball and recommended a review, with a penalty eventually being given. Which led to more controversy about the first penalty not being given.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw14-var-controversies\">GW14 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 14 was a quiet one for VAR, with just one contentious decision in Newcastle&#8217;s draw with Tottenham<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-newcastle-s-penalty-have-been-awarded\">Should Newcastle&#8217;s penalty have been awarded?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 2-2 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (68.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle were pushing for a winner in their game against Tottenham, with the sides level at 1-1. The Magpies had a corner, sent into the box where Dan Burn went down. Burn and Rodrigo Bentancur had already been warned for tussling, but both still had hold of each other. Nothing was given, though, and the ball was flicked out for another corner. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The incident was checked, of course, and VAR recommended a review. After watching the replay at the screen, the referee changed his decision to penalty, with Bentancur deemed to have not been looking at the ball. Many felt the foul was a soft one, and certainly not worth the overturn. Some also felt the call came with a lack of consistency, for the kind of tussling that happens at most corners in the Premier League.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw13-var-controversies\">GW13 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 13 was an interesting one for VAR controversies. There were two in each of the two derbies this week, involving Chelsea and Arsenal, and Aston Villa and Wolves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-jean-philippe-mateta-right-to-get-a-second-chance\">Was Jean-Philippe Mateta right to get a second chance?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Crystal Palace 1-2 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Retake<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Retake (75.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jean-Philippe Mateta put Crystal Palace 1-0 up against Manchester United at Selhurst Park, sending Senne Lammens the wrong way from the penalty spot. But it turns out that he had accidentally touched the ball twice. This was seen by VAR, with Mateta retaking and scoring. Mateta was allowed to retake because of a new rule, specifically around an accidental double touch of a penalty. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If a player accidentally double touches a penalty and scores, it must be retaken. If the penalty is missed, an indirect free-kick is awarded to the defending team. That punishment is the same as if it were a deliberate double touch. This all happened as a result of the fallout following Julian Alvarez&#8217;s penalty in the Champions League for Atletico Madrid against Real Madrid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-wolves-unfairly-punished-for-offside\">Were Wolves unfairly punished for offside?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 1-0 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (60.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Subjective offside calls seem to be becoming more common. Wolves thought they had taken the lead against Midland rivals Aston Villa when Jorgen Strand Larsen finished well following a cutback. But it was immediately ruled out by the refeere for offside. The offside call was not against Strand Larsen, but Jhon Arias, who had been standing directly in front of Emiliano Martinez in an offside position. The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, with Arias deemed to have impacted Martinez &#8212; he was practically standing on Martinez&#8217;s toes and ducked out of the way of the ball. But this did draw comparisons to recently allowed, and disallowed, goals for similar offside calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-jhon-arias-have-seen-red\">Should Jhon Arias have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 1-0 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (59%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another incident involving Arias, this time for a potential red card. As Wolves were chasing the game, Arias went in for a challenge on Boubacar Kamara, that left the Frenchman down in the middle of the pitch. Nothing was given and play went on. It was checked by VAR for serious foul play, and recommended for a review. Replays showed that Arias had jumped into the tackle with both feet off the ground, stamping on Kamara&#8217;s foot. Chris Kavanagh reviewed the footage on the screen but decided a yellow card was enough, calling Arias&#8217; tackle a &#8220;reckless challenge only&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-moises-caicedo-rightly-sent-off\">Was Moises Caicedo rightly sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 1-1 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (80.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The London derby between Chelsea and Arsenal was a fiery affair. As the game ticked over the half-hour mark, Moises Caicedo and Mikel Merino both went for the ball in the middle of the pitch. Caicedo caught Merino, though both stayed down. After Caicedo received treatment, he was booked by referee Anthony Taylor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But VAR had already reviewed the foul, which saw Caicedo catch Merino on the ankle with his studs &#8212; a dangerous tackle to make, especially given wetness of the pitch and speed of the tackle. Taylor was sent to review the challenge and upgraded his yellow to a red for serious foul play. Caicedo was deemed to have used &#8220;excessive force&#8221; that &#8220;endangers the safety of the opponent&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although VAR had already reviewed the challenge before the yellow was shown &#8212; due to the length of Caicedo&#8217;s treatment &#8212; Taylor had to make his initial decision clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-piero-hincapie-have-been-sent-off\">Should Piero Hincapie have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 1-1 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (53%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Just moments after Caicedo was sent off, Chelsea wanted Arsenal down to 10. Trevoh Chalobah went down on the edge of his own area after a collision with Piero Hincapie. The Arsenal man was booked, having caught Chalobah in the face with his elbow. The incident will have been checked by VAR has Chalobah received treatment, sporting a fast-appearing bump on the impact spot. But a yellow card was deemed sufficient, with no evidence of the elbow being deliberate, rather a consequence of Hincapie jumping naturally to challenge for the ball.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Enzo Maresca said after the game: &#8220;The Trevoh one, I asked the referee, he said to me that it was not an elbow. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;So, this is what they said. [He had a] black eye, with ice at half-time. But they judge in different way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">GW12 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 12 was an interesting one for VAR controversies. There was another involving Chelsea, while Liverpool had more offside rule complaints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Should Chalobah have been punished for handball?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Burnley 0-2 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (68.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was an interesting topic for debate. And one with examples both for and against it. Chelsea had a goal kick which Robert Sanchez appeared to have taken, passing the ball to Trevoh Chalobah. But Chalobah then moved the ball in the six-yard box with his hands, setting up to take the goal kick himself. The referee let it slide, telling the Burnley attackers to go out of the box, with Chalobah then taking the goal kick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It wasn\u2019t too long ago that Tyrone Mings was sent off for doing the exact same thing in a Champions League game for Aston Villa \u2013 though he wasn\u2019t as close as the six-yard box. But in the same competition in 2023-24, Gabriel wasn\u2019t penalised for mirroring Chalobah. Then-Bayern Munich boss Thomas Tuchel wasn\u2019t happy with the lack of a penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Should Nottingham Forest\u2019s first goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 0-3 Nottingham Forest<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (65.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liverpool fans weren\u2019t happy with this one. Murillo gave Nottingham Forest the lead just after the half-hour mark, but Liverpool wanted it ruled out for offside. As Murillo connected with the ball, Dan Ndoye had been standing in Alisson\u2019s eye line, from an offside position. The decision was checked by VAR and the goal was allowed to stand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But Liverpool fans were furious, having seen a goal against Manchester City disallowed for a similar situation.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher told Sky Sports\u2019 Ref Watch: &#8220;The difference is Robertson moves. He moves to the ball.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He added: &#8220;Last week it was said the Liverpool goal should have been a goal. This week two have been given as goals. You could say everyone has looked and learnt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;They haven&#8217;t been inconsistent, they have actually recognised and thought in this situation the more acceptable situation is a goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;They have actually given people what they want.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-igor-jesus-handle-the-ball\">Did Igor Jesus handle the ball?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 0-3 Nottingham Forest<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (72.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There\u2019s a chance that the decision on Nottingham Forest\u2019s first goal was evened out very quickly after. Two minutes after going ahead, Igor Jesus thought he had put Forest 2-0 up. But the referee immediately ruled the goal out, deeming Jesus to have handled the ball. Accidental or not, as Jesus was the goalscorer, evidence of a handball would mean no goal. It was checked by VAR, but replays weren\u2019t clear as to whether the ball had actually hit Jesus\u2019 hand. There were some angles where it looked as though it had hit him in the chest. But because the referee had given handball, VAR deemed there was inconclusive evidence of an error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Were Arsenal lucky with their second?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Arsenal 4-1 Tottenham Hotspur<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (54.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another subjective offside decision, this time in the north London derby. Eberechi Eze put Arsenal 2-0 up against rivals Tottenham Hotspur with a nice finish through a crowd. As always, the goal was checked, and Tottenham had reason to be aggrieved. Replays showed that two players appeared to be standing in the eye line of Guglielmo Vicario as the shot came in, and both were in offside positions. Vicario did react late to the shot too. But VAR deemed that neither player was in his eye line and the goal stood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThis is what I don&#8217;t understand,\u201d Gallagher told Sky Sports\u2019 Ref Watch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think both of those players are in the goalkeeper&#8217;s eyeline. I&#8217;m told because they peel away from that, they&#8217;re not impacting.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Was Idrissa Gueye\u2019s red card fair?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 0-1 Everton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says:<\/strong> No red card (55.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton were reduced to 10 men at Old Trafford, but not in a standard way. Idrissa Gueye was sent off for slapping teammate Michael Keane in the face, after being annoyed following a misplaced pass. The referee was looking straight at it and did not hesitate to show the red for violent conduct. Fans of a certain age were immediately taken back to the fight between Kieron Dyer and Lee Bowyer for Newcastle in 2005, which saw both players sent off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ricardo Fuller was the most recent player to be sent off for fighting with a teammate in the Premier League, for Stoke City back in December 2008. But fans of all clubs seemed to feel Gueye\u2019s red card was harsh, both for the lack of force in the slap and because it was his own teammate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw11-var-controveries\">GW11 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 11 seemed to be going ahead quite smoothly. But there were a few controversial calls made on the second day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-dewsbury-hall-s-goal-have-counted\">Should Dewsbury-Hall&#8217;s goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Everton 2-0 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (56.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall thought he had put Everton 2-0 up early in the first half, with a good finish. But it was immediately ruled out for offside by the linesman. Thiero Barry was deemed to have challenged an opponent for the ball while in an offside position. The Everton forward had swung a leg to try to win the ball against Sander Berge, who could only hit the ball into the path of Dewsbury-Hall. VAR reviewed the decision and agreed with the initial call.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-ouattara-wrongly-booked-for-simulation\">Was Ouattara wrongly booked for simulation?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 3-1 Newcastle<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (72.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dango Ouattara was booked for simulation midway through the second half against Newcastle. He had gone down in the box after a challenge from defender Dan Burn. As it was in the box, VAR checked the decision for a penalty. Replays showed that Burn had stood on Ouattara&#8217;s foot, causing the Brentford forward to go down. But VAR upheld the referee&#8217;s initial decision, deeming there to be minimal contact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-man-city-rightly-awarded-a-penalty\">Were Man City rightly awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man City 3-0 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (63.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was the first of two controversial calls in a big game, both of which went in Man City&#8217;s favour. Jeremy Doku went down in the box after a challenge from Giorgi Mamardashvili but nothing was given on the pitch and play went on. Naturally, it was checked by VAR. And they recommended a review for a foul, with the referee altering his decision. Replays showed that while there was contact, it was minimal. It brought conversations of whether it was a clear and obvious error, worthy of the overturn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-liverpool-hard-done-by-with-disallowed-goal\">Were Liverpool hard done by with disallowed goal?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man City 3-0 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (75.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second controversial decision came with a disallowed goal. But this wasn&#8217;t an overturn, it was an initial decision being stuck with. Virgil van Dijk thought he had equalised late in the first half. But it was immediately disallowed for offside. Andrew Robertson was in an offside position and ducked out of the way of the shot, standing just in front of Gianluigi Donnarumma. The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, with the explanation of Robertson &#8220;making an obvious action directly in front og the goalkeeper&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher told Sky Sports&#8217; Ref Watch: &#8220;This was an on-field decision, which was no goal. So VAR looks and says: &#8216;Is Robertson in an offside position? Yes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;&#8216;Is he impacting on the goalkeeper?&#8217; They obviously felt yes, because he was close. That&#8217;s why people are going, &#8216;it should be this or this&#8217;. It&#8217;s open to interpretation.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw10-var-controversies\">GW10 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was another controversial week for the Premier League, with a handful of red card calls &#8212; both missed and given.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-emmanuel-agbadou-rightly-sent-off\">Was Emmanuel Agbadou rightly sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 3-0 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (70.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Wolves were reduced to 10 men in the first half of their defeat against Fulham. Emmanuel Agbadou was sent off for bringing down Josh King as he was racing into the box. Although King was out wide, he was running towards goal, so the decision was for a denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity. It was checked and confirmed by VAR, who also cleared King for a potential handball in the buildup &#8212; which would have negated the foul and the red.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-rodrigo-bentancur-lucky-not-to-have-seen-red\">Was Rodrigo Bentancur lucky not to have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 0-1 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red (67.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were a couple of flashpoints in Chelsea&#8217;s win over Tottenham. The first came just before half-time as Rodrigo Bentancur fouled Reece James in the middle of the pitch. Bentancur had caught James on the ankle with a bit of force, and there was a slight buckle. Jarred Gillett booked Bentancur and VAR upheld the decision, only deeming it a reckless challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-enzo-fernandez-spared-a-red\">Was Enzo Fernandez spared a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Tottenham 0-1 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (50.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second red card decision came in the second half. And this time it was in favour of Chelsea. Enzo Fernandez was booked for a high tackle on Joao Palhinha, but Tottenham wanted more. The tackle was checked by VAR, who deemed it reckless rather than dangerous. There were discussions from those watching the game over whether Bentancur incident played a part in the decision. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-amadou-onana-have-seen-red\">Should Amadou Onana have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 2-0 Aston Villa<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red (53.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another potential red call this week. This time it was for a tussle, rather than a tackle. Amadou Onana was booked for a clash with Alexis Mac Allister in the box for a corner. Replays showed that Onana had his hands around Mac Allister&#8217;s neck, which is normally a red card offence. VAR checked the decision and deemed a yellow sufficient. Onana&#8217;s action was seen as more of a push than anything else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-sunderland-denied-a-penalty\">Were Sunderland denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Sunderland 1-1 Everton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (56.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sunderland wanted a penalty late on against Everton. Noah Sadiki attempted to cross the ball into the box but it hit Michael Keane&#8217;s outstretched arm. Nothing was given on the pitch, despite Keane&#8217;s arm being so far out from his body. And the decision was upheld by VAR, who deemed his arm had been in a justifiable position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw9-var-controversies\">GW9 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gameweek 9 was a busy one for VAR, with a few controversial calls spread across the weekend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-amad-diallo-denied-a-penalty\">Was Amad Diallo denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 4-2 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (70.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd wanted an early penalty in their eventual win over Brighton, with Amad Diallo going down in the box. The Ivorian was brought down after a challenge from Maxim De Cuyper, who caught him with his back leg. Anthony Taylor did not give the penalty and his call was backed up by VAR. They believed that De Cuyper had got a touch on the ball to rule out a foul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-bryan-mbeumo-s-first-goal-have-counted\">Should Bryan Mbeumo&#8217;s first goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 4-2 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (54.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bryan Mbeumo scored two goals against Brighton, but the Seagulls wanted his first ruled out. Luke Shaw had pulled Georginio Rutter&#8217;s shirt in the build up while winning the ball back. The goal was given and VAR agreed with Anthony Taylor, deeming contact to be minimal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-brentford-correctly-awarded-a-penalty\">Were Brentford correctly awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 3-2 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Free-kick<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (65.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brentford were initially awarded a free-kick on the edge of the Liverpool box for a foul on Dango Ouattara. Liverpool were incensed that the foul had been given, believing contact to be minimal. As always with fouls in close proximity to the penalty area, it was checked by VAR. And after a long wait, VAR deemed that the challenge was on the line, and therefore in the box. So a penalty was given, without having to send the referee to the screen. But Liverpool fans weren&#8217;t entirely convinced that the foul had been on the line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-flemming-s-second-goal-have-counted\">Should Flemming&#8217;s second goal have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Wolves 2-3 Burnley<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (64.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zian Flemming scored twice to put Burnley 2-0 up against Wolves in the first half. But the hosts wanted his second disallowed. As the ball was cut back from the byline, Flemming tussled with Santiago Bueno in the box. Bueno went to ground, leaving Flemming free to tap home. It was checked by VAR for a foul by Flemming, but the goal stood on the grounds of mutual holding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-everton-denied-an-equaliser\">Were Everton denied an equaliser?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Everton 0-3 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (58.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton thought they had equalised against Tottenham after Jake O&#8217;Brien headed home from a corner. The goal was given by the referee and his assistants, but Guglielmo Vicario appealed straight away. Iliman Ndiaye and Jack Grealish had been close to him and made contact, preventing him from stopping the header. As they had both been offside at the point of O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s contact, the goal was ruled out for their interference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">GW8 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Premier League returned from its second international break in October, and there were a few controversial calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Should Jarred Gillett have listened to VAR?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Crystal Palace 3-3 Bournemouth<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (58.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Crystal Palace wanted a red card shown to Marcos Senesi after he brought down Ismaila Sarr. The Senegalese winger had been racing through on goal, but Senesi was only shown a yellow card by Jarred Gillett. It was checked by VAR for a potential denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity, and a review was recommended. But Gillett stuck with his initial decision, claiming that Sarr had moved slightly wide, with enough Bournemouth defenders covering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Was VAR right to overturn Arsenal&#8217;s penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 0-1 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (60.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arsenal thought they had a chance to go 0-2 up against Fulham when. Bukayo Saka was brought down in the box by Kevin, with Anthony Taylor pointing to the spot. As always, it was checked by VAR and Taylor was sent for an on-screen review. The initial decision was eventually overturned, due to Kevin playing the ball with \u201cno foul committed\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Were Liverpool denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 1-2 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (68.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liverpool wanted a penalty for handball in their game against Man Utd at Anfield. Midway through the first half, Amad Diallo had blocked a close-range cross from Cody Gakpo inside the Man Utd box. Liverpool naturally appealed, but Michael Oliver wasn\u2019t having any of it. No penalty was given due to the close proximity of the cross, and the fact that Diallo\u2019s arms were in a natural position. And VAR agreed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw7-var-controversies\">GW7 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This week&#8217;s controversies were relatively few and far between and the Squawka X community thought that only one of the decisions was incorrect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-christantus-uche-have-been-shown-a-red-card\">Should Christantus Uche have been shown a red card?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Everton 2-1 Crystal Palace<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (54.5%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VAR took a long look at Crystal Palace forward Christantus Uche\u2019s jab into the stomach of James Tarkowski in the dying minutes of the Eagles&#8217; 1-2 defeat at Goodison Park. The Everton defender didn\u2019t go down, but did appeal to referee Michael Salisbury. However, no violent conduct red card was issued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Uche was clearly frustrated at the late goal his team had conceded at the Hill Dickinson Stadium and while there wasn&#8217;t much force in the decision, the officials took their time before coming to their decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-chelsea-have-had-a-first-half-penalty\">Should Chelsea have had a first-half penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 2-1 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (57.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea almost had a chance to extend their first-half lead over Liverpool to two goals when Alejandro Garnacho was able to get around Dominik Szoboszlai and enter the box before going down under some pressure from the Hungarian.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Anthony Taylor waved away the protests at the time and after a brief look at the decision the VAR officials deemed the contact to be minimal and not enough to have sent Garnacho tumbling and our followers on X agreed with that decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-sunderland-unlucky-to-have-penalty-decision-overturned\">Were Sunderland unlucky to have penalty decision overturned?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 2-0 Sunderland<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (63.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In stoppage time of the first-half at Old Trafford, Sunderland were offered an opportunity to get themselves back into the game after Mason Mount and Benjamin Sesko had fired Manchester United into a two goal lead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Trai Hume contested Nordi Mukiele&#8217;s long throw into the box with Sesko and was awarded a penalty with referee Stuart Attwell judging that the Man Utd forward&#8217;s boot was too high. But VAR official Neil Davies recommended an on-field review and the decision was overturned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Black Cats boss Regis le Bris chose not to talk about the decision after the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-could-bournemouth-have-been-given-a-penalty\">Could Bournemouth have been given a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Bournemouth 3-1 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (54.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the closest polls we&#8217;ve seen this season, the decision to not award a penalty to Bournemouth after Evanilson went down under a challenge from Fulham&#8217;s Issa Diop on Friday night really did split opinion within our X following. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was a relatively long wait as the VAR officials took a second look at the incident, with Diop appearing to stand on the foot of the Brazilian forward but in the end they decided not to overturn Simon Hooper&#8217;s on-field decision of no penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw6-var-controversies\">GW6 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was the busiest weekend yet for VAR controversies in the 2025-26 Premier League. Four of the seven incidents came on Sunday, with two in Aston Villa&#8217;s home game against Fulham and another two in Arsenal&#8217;s trip to Newcastle. And all four were surrounding penalties not given.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-nathan-collins-have-seen-red\">Should Nathan Collins have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 3-1 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (72.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd had a chance to equalise against Brentford when they were awarded a penalty. Bryan Mbeumo was brought down in the box by Nathan Collins, as he tried to get his toe onto a cross. There wasn&#8217;t too much controversy about the penalty, with the referee giving himself a moment to decide. But there was a question of a potential sending off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As Collins hadn&#8217;t made an attempt to win the ball, he wasn&#8217;t protected by the double jeopardy rule &#8212; pulling on Mbeumo&#8217;s shirt. He was booked by the referee and, after a long check, VAR agreed. They felt that Mbeumo was unlikely to get a proper connection on the ball, and so no obvious goalscoring opportunity was denied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The referee told me Bryan was not in control of the ball. I think he was not in control of the ball because he was pulled,&#8221; Ruben Amorim told reporters after the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I want, especially in these kind of moments, to not focus on the referee.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-chelsea-fortunate-to-not-concede-a-penalty\">Were Chelsea fortunate to not concede a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 1-3 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (64.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea fell to Brighton and Hove Albion late on, conceding two goals in injury time. But Brighton could have had an opportunity to take the lead just before. Yankuba Minteh went down in the box following a high foot from Malo Gusto, who looked nervous about conceding a penalty. But nothing was given by the referee, uncertain of any contact from Gusto. It was checked by VAR and the on-field decision remained, with the replays unable to provide &#8220;conclusive evidence&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But Brighton fans were not happy, believing there was a clear penalty missed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-liverpool-s-equaliser-have-counted\">Should Liverpool&#8217;s equaliser have counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Crystal Palace 2-1 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (70.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liverpool looked to have done it again, coming from behind to secure a point against Crystal Palace. But the Eagles gave Liverpool a taste of their own medicine, winning the match injury time. The question is, should Liverpool&#8217;s equaliser have counted? Federico Chiesa was the goalscorer, but Palace wanted it disallowed for a handball from Mo Salah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As the ball went into the box, Salah jumped to contest with his arm raised. It went over his head and eventually rebounded to Chiesa, who scored. The goal was checked for a handball by Salah, whose arm was so high that it would have been disallowed. But VAR could not find conclusive evidence that Salah had touched the ball with his hand, so they stuck with the on-field decision. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-josh-king-fouled-in-the-box\">Was Josh King fouled in the box?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 3-1 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (50.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Midway through the first half of their game against Aston Villa, Fulham wanted two penalties. The first was for a potential foul on Josh King by Emiliano Martinez. King was played through by Alex Iwobi and took a touch to the right, before colliding with Martinez. After taking a moment to think, the referee awarded a free-kick to Aston Villa and penalised King for simulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Replays showed that King had thrown himself into Martinez, going the other side to where he had touched the ball. He also looked to be going down before the contact, which was the explanation given by VAR when backing the referee&#8217;s call.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fulham boss Marco Silva wasn&#8217;t happy with the decision, saying: &#8220;The referee was very quick to give the yellow card. I watched the images and it\u2019s clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;He was tackled by Martinez, 100% \u2013 nobody can tell me he was not. If a player is tackled by the goalkeeper in the box, 99% of the time it is a penalty. The other 1%, was this one today \u2013 not a penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;[The officials] can call us, they can write to us what they want but it\u2019s clear that it was a penalty.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-matty-cash-handle-the-ball\">Did Matty Cash handle the ball?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Aston Villa 3-1 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (65%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Just moments later, Fulham had another opportunity when King&#8217;s shot was blocked by Matty Cash. The effort looked to be hitting the target, while Cash&#8217;s arm was away from his body. But as Cash had been turning his body away from the shot, VAR believed that his arm was in a justifiable position. And so, the on-field decision remained again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-arsenal-unfairly-denied-a-penalty\">Were Arsenal unfairly denied a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 1-2 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (61.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now we move onto a controversial overturn. Arsenal were awarded a penalty after Viktor Gyokeres was brought down in the box by Nick Pope. Jarred Gillett&#8217;s penalty decision was pretty instant, and replays showed that there was clear contact from Pope on Gyokeres. But VAR deliberated and found a slight touch from Pope on the ball, which Gillett had apparently missed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And that proved vital in the overturn. But there was a lot of controversy about the final decision, as fans felt that the contact from Pope was enough to negate the slightest of touch he had on the ball. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-newcastle-have-had-a-penalty-1\">Should Newcastle have had a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 1-2 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (52.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle wanted a late penalty after the ball struck Gabriel&#8217;s hand as he tried to block a shot. The Brazilian had slid to the ground, but the ball didn&#8217;t strike his supporting arm &#8212; ruling out that easy answer. Instead, it hit Gabriel&#8217;s other arm, which was high in the air. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The crucial point here seems to be an initial deflection on Gabriel&#8217;s leg, which then sent the ball to the Brazilian&#8217;s arm. Deflections are usually used as reasons to not give penalties, providing it had altered the trajectory &#8212; unless it&#8217;s by a goalscorer, of course.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw5-var-controversies\">GW5 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once again, Chelsea were embroiled in VAR controversy. This time they felt that Robert Sanchez&#8217;s red card was harsh. Elsewhere, Fulham thought they should&#8217;ve had a more comfortable win against Brentford while Newcastle felt they were denied all three points away to Bournemouth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-robert-sanchez-right-to-see-red\">Was Robert Sanchez right to see red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 2-1 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (83.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea saw their chances of taking anything from Old Trafford crumble within the first five minutes of the game when Robert Sanchez was sent off for a challenge on Bryan Mbeumo just outside the Chelsea penalty area. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Replays show that Sanchez might&#8217;ve made contact with the ball first before clattering into the Man Utd forward but VAR didn&#8217;t intervene, concluding that it wasn&#8217;t a &#8216;clear and obvious&#8217; error. Sanchez&#8217;s red card stood and Man Utd went on to take a 2-0 lead before half time, eventually winning the contest 2-1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-rodrigo-muniz-s-goal-rightly-ruled-out\">Was Rodrigo Muniz&#8217;s goal rightly ruled out?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 3-1 Brentford<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (52.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fulham were well on top against Brentford, leading 3-1 and looking very comfortable. They thought they&#8217;d extended their lead further when Rodrigo Muniz unleashed a brilliant shot to beat Caoimhin Kelleher in the Brentford goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despite originally being awarded, a VAR review on the goal decided that the goal should be disallowed due to Muniz catching Brentford defender, Nathan Collins, in the face with his arm in the build up to the goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-woltemade-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Woltemade have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Bournemouth 0-0 Newcastle<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (56.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Newcastle were denied a penalty when Nick Woltemade felt his shirt had been pulled by Bournemouth defender, Bafode Diakite. There certainly appeared to be plenty of contact between the two players but referee, Robert Jones, adjudged Woltemade to have gone down too easily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The VAR control room agreed, with no official review taking place and the two sides continued to play out their goalless draw.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw4-var-controveries\">GW4 VAR controveries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chelsea were yet again involved in a contentious VAR decision. But this time they felt they were hard-done-by. There were two potentially missed red cards across the weekend, with one in Newcastle United&#8217;s win over Wolverhampton Wanderers, and another as Liverpool beat Burnley. And Tottenham felt they were harshly penalised in their London derby against West Ham.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-cristian-romero-s-goal-have-stood\">Should Cristian Romero&#8217;s goal have stood?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: West Ham 0-3 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (65.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tottenham thought they had taken the lead from a corner in the London derby against West Ham, which Cristian Romero heading home. But almost immediately after the ball hit the back of the net, Jarred Gillett ruled it out for a foul. Micky van de Ven was deemed to have pushed Kyle Walker-Peters, a soft decision on the face of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But replays showed that Van de Ven himself had been pushed by Mateus Fernandes. Which brought arguments of the referee&#8217;s decision being overturned, as the foul was not first initiated by Van de Ven. But VAR went with the on-field call, and a free-kick was given to West Ham.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The problem for VAR is he&#8217;s given the foul on field, and the pictures show he does. The referee really picked the wrong foul,&#8221; Dermot Gallagher told Sky Sports&#8217; Ref Watch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;There are so many incidents in that, that the referee&#8217;s focus is on that rather than the larger picture.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-yerson-mosquera-deserve-a-red\">Did Yerson Mosquera deserve a red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Newcastle 1-0 Wolves<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (51%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some Newcastle fans wanted a red card, a penalty, or both in the first half of their win over Wolves. Harvey Barnes looked to be advanced on goal when he went down on the edge of the Wolves&#8217; box after a challenge from Yerson Mosquera. But the referee wasn&#8217;t interested in anything, not even awarding a foul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was checked by VAR, who agreed with the referee&#8217;s decision. But replays showed that Mosquera did lead with his elbow and connected with Barnes&#8217; head. It was outside the area, so wouldn&#8217;t have been a penalty, but there was definitely enough for a red card to be considered. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-there-an-offside-in-brentford-s-equaliser\">Was there an offside in Brentford&#8217;s equaliser?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 2-2 Chelsea<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (50.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You can&#8217;t be offside from a throw in, as many fans pointed out over the weekend. But there was still a potential offside offence from Brentford long throw that led to Fabio Carvalho&#8217;s equaliser against Chelsea. Kristoffer Ajer had flicked the ball on from the throw, to Carvalho at the back post, who tapped in. But as Ajer connected with the ball, Dango Ouattara had been in an offside position. Ouattara then went attempted to connect with the ball, calling that portion of the offside law into question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was a subjective offside call, though, and VAR did not feel that Ouattara&#8217;s attempt had impacted Reece James behind him. So the goal stood, and Brentford took a much-deserved point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-lesley-ugochukwu-lucky-to-receive-an-early-yellow\">Was Lesley Ugochukwu lucky to receive an early yellow?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Burnley 0-1 Liverpool<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No red card (50.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lesley Ugochukwu was sent off for Burnley against Liverpool, for two yellow cards. The second came late on, and some fans felt that yellow was harsh. But the midfielder could just have easily been sent off when he received his first yellow in the 16th minute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ugochukwu went in hard on Alexis Mac Allister in an attempted tackle, but caught the Argentine&#8217;s ankle instead, causing it to buckle. Because the tackle was still low, though, and came from a close proximity, Ugochukwu escaped with just a yellow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw3-var-controversies\">GW3 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This week&#8217;s contentious decisions were spread across just two games. The first was Fulham&#8217;s trip to Chelsea, where the Cottagers had a very controversially disallowed goal &#8212; with VAR intervening. VAR then intervened to award a penalty that had been missed. There was also the story of two penalties in Man Utd&#8217;s game against Burnley at Old Trafford.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-josh-king-have-given-fulham-the-lead\">Should Josh King have given Fulham the lead?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 2-0 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (69.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There may not be a more controversial call in the Premier League this season. Certainly not one that brings as much anger. Fulham thought they had taken the lead in the west London derby against Chelsea when Josh King launched a one-man counter attack. The goal was excellent, with King starting inside his own half before showing composure to cut inside and wrong-foot both Robert Sanchez and Tosin Adarabioyo. King had received the ball from Rodrigo Muniz, who looked to have shown good strength to hold up the ball under a challenge from Trevoh Chalobah. Or so everyone thought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chalobah stayed on the floor after losing the battle, and the tussle was checked by VAR. Replays showed that, in shielding the ball, Muniz had trod on Chalobah&#8217;s foot. After a long review, referee Rob Jones was called to the screen to check the incident himself. Jones eventually ruled out the goal for a &#8220;careless challenge&#8221; on Chalobah from Muniz. Chelsea fans were happy with the decision, but everyone else wasn&#8217;t &#8212; feeling the foul was soft and not enough to overturn the goal. There was also the lost magic moment of King scoring his first Premier League goal against his club&#8217;s rivals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PGMOL have since come out to acknowledge that VAR made a mistake in helping to overturn the call &#8212; it did not reach the threshold for an intervention of a clear and obvious error. As a result, VAR Michael Salisbury was removed from the same role he had set to take up in Liverpool&#8217;s game against Arsenal. But the damage was done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-chelsea-rightly-awarded-a-penalty\">Were Chelsea rightly awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 2-0 Fulham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (51.3%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VAR wasn&#8217;t done with the derby there. Five minutes into the second half, Chelsea wanted a penalty after Chalobah&#8217;s cross was blocked by Ryan Sessegnon. This was another long review, with various components. The ball did hit Sessegnon&#8217;s arm, which was raised away from the body. When the penalty was finally given, the announcement deemed that Sessegnon had made his body &#8220;unnaturally bigger&#8221;. But earlier in the move, the ball had hit Joao Pedro&#8217;s hand &#8212; which brought more anger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was a reason for this to be overlooked though, as the ball had been kicked onto his hand from close range. That would have only been given as a handball if Pedro had scored after the ball hit his hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-a-tale-of-two-penalties-part-one\">A Tale of Two Penalties: Part One<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 3-2 Burnley<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No penalty (57.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd were awarded a penalty in the first half against Burnley, after Mason Mount went down in the box under a challenge from Kyle Walker. As always, the decision was looked at, and it was deemed that a foul had not taken place. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It did look like that had been contact, with a potential tangle of legs. But replays could not find any to deem a penalty the right decision. So it was overturned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-a-tale-of-two-penalties-part-two\">A Tale of Two Penalties: Part Two<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 3-2 Burnley<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (54.7%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Man Utd weren&#8217;t awarded a penalty late on after Amad Diallo went down in the box. He looked to have been pulled to the ground by Jaidon Anthony. This time, VAR reviewed and found in favour of Man Utd, recommending a penalty for a &#8220;sustained pulling action&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now, the pulling was clear, but there was contention over where the foul took place. It wasn&#8217;t clear from the replays if Anthony had let go of Diallo&#8217;s shirt by the time he got into the box. But VAR felt it was clear enough to award the penalty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw2-var-controversies\">GW2 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Manchester United&#8217;s game against Fulham brought two contentious VAR decisions, including another penalty call. Everton were on the wrong end of another penalty call, which wasn&#8217;t overturned by VAR. There was the case of a potential red card in Tottenham&#8217;s trip to face Man City, and a disallowed Brentford goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-james-trafford-have-been-sent-off\">Should James Trafford have been sent off?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man City 0-2 Tottenham<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Red card (75.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the big talking points from this mouth-watering clash was Pep Guardiola\u2019s decision to stick with James Trafford in goal, despite Ederson\u2019s return from illness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision appeared to have backfired when his sloppy pass inside Man City\u2019s box was intercepted by Pape Sarr, which led to Joao Palhinha scoring Tottenham\u2019s second goal in first-half stoppage time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But could that have been avoided? Well, yes, had referee Peter Bankes opted to send him off following his collision with Mohammed Kudus a few minutes earlier. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pair roughly collided just outside Man City\u2019s box, leaving Kudus in a heap as they challenged for a loose ball, which also appeared to strike the goalkeeper on the arm. But, no foul was given, and VAR did not send the referee for a review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-brentford-denied-a-second-goal\">Were Brentford denied a second goal?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Brentford 1-0 Aston Villa<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Goal (62.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brentford claimed their first victory of the season, with new signing Dango Ouattara becoming an instant hero as he scored the winning goal just 12 minutes into his debut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the Bees\u2019 margin of victory would have been even greater had Mikkel Damsgaard\u2019s volley not been disallowed just before half-time. Referee Tony Harrington ruled Nathan Collins to have fouled Emiliano Martinez after a long throw.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision was checked and confirmed by VAR, deeming &#8216;Collins carelessly challenged the goalkeeper&#8217;. But the Argentine appeared to go into the Brentford defender.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Not many people expected a foul there, it\u2019s not what I call a clear foul,&#8221; said former referee Dermot Gallagher on Sky Sports\u2019 Ref Watch. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;If you look at the Villa players, nobody\u2019s really interested [in appealing], there\u2019s not a lot going on there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The referee gives a foul; that\u2019s his choice. The problem is when VAR looks at it, you do see [Collins] go into Martinez.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ex-Premier League striker Jay Bothroyd argued: &#8220;The whole time, Collins is looking at the ball. Where Collins has stopped is where Martinez comes out, and there is contact. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I think the reason Collins stops is because he can see his teammate [Sepp van den Berg], and he\u2019s already in the air challenging for the ball.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-kiernan-dewsbury-hall-harshly-penalised\">Was Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall harshly penalised?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Everton 2-0 Brighton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (52.4%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Everton made a winning start to life at their brand-new Hill Dickinson Stadium, beating Brighton and Hove Albion 2-0. But they were given a scare late on when the Seagulls were awarded a penalty. However, Danny Welbeck&#8217;s tame effort was ultimately saved by Jordan Pickford.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A shot struck Dewsbury-Hall\u2019s hand in the box and though it appeared harsh as he was in such close proximity to the effort, VAR ruled he &#8216;had his arm raised and made his body unjustifiably bigger&#8217;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;It is harsh, but it\u2019s the rule,&#8221; Dermot Gallagher analysed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;His arm\u2019s out, it hits his arm, it\u2019s a shot on goal, so it\u2019s always going to be punished. When your arm\u2019s that high, it\u2019s always going to be given.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-man-utd-have-been-awarded-a-penalty\">Should Man Utd have been awarded a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 1-1 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>Penalty (56.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Manchester United were held to a 1-1 draw against Fulham, but they could have taken all three from Craven Cottage &#8212; had Bruno Fernandes not skied a first-half penalty. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Referee Chris Kavanagh did not initially point to the spot after Calvin Bassey grappled with Mason Mount in the 33rd minute. However, the official overturned his decision following a VAR review, claiming the Fulham defender pulled the United midfielder to the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thankfully for the hosts, it proved academic after Fernandes\u2019 miss, with Marco Silva\u2019s side coming from behind for the second weekend running to earn a point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-fulham-unfortunate-to-concede-opener\">Were Fulham unfortunate to concede opener?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Fulham 1-1 Man Utd<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka poll says: <\/strong>No goal (66.8%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Later in that same game, Man Utd eventually found the breakthrough after Rodrigo Muniz unwittingly deflected Leny Yoro\u2019s header into his own net. It came from Bryan Mbeumo\u2019s corner, with Yoro using two hands to push Bassey out of the way before getting his head to the ball.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The goal subsequently stood and, although contact was minimal, it was enough to put the Fulham defender out of his stride, while giving the Man Utd centre-back the advantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The referee on-field gave a goal and VAR said it\u2019s a little push, it\u2019s not impactful,&#8221; Dermot Gallagher said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;This is where the grey area is; all subjective decisions are like that. Fulham will feel aggrieved.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;It does look soft, but ultimately, Bassey\u2019s looking at the ball the whole way,&#8221; Bothroyd countered. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;When you\u2019re looking at the ball, you\u2019re trying to time the jump, so if you feel a little push in the back, your momentum\u2019s going to take you forward.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;From Yoro\u2019s point of view, he\u2019s trying to get separation from Bassey as well so he can jump. On that occasion, I think it should have been a foul, but ultimately, it\u2019s interpretation.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gw1-var-controversies\">GW1 VAR controversies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The opening weekend wasn&#8217;t safe from VAR controversies, and there was a variety. Liverpool were subject to the first, feeling Bournemouth should have been reduced to 10 men in the Premier League opener. Crystal Palace will feel the most hard-done-by, though, after their disallowed goal against Chelsea followed a VAR intervention. There were also penalty calls in the games between Manchester United and Arsenal, and Leeds United and Everton.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-should-marcos-senesi-have-seen-red\">Should Marcos Senesi have seen red?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Liverpool 4-2 Bournemouth<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No red card<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka polls says: <\/strong>Red card (77.6%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first VAR controversy of the new season came in its very first match. Liverpool thought they had an obvious goalscoring opportunity denied by Marcos Senesi, when the Bournemouth defender appeared to handle the ball. Nothing was given by Anthony Taylor, but it was checked for a red card as the ball had looked set to play Hugo Ekitike in. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But Michael Oliver&#8217;s review was quick and did not find an issue with Taylor&#8217;s initial decision. Former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher felt the review was too quick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think this is a really interesting situation. The VAR, for me, has looked at it too quickly and cleared it,\u201d Gallagher said on Sky Sports&#8217; Ref Watch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think he\u2019s seen the ball fly up off Senesi and has not watched the second part. He\u2019s seen the ball hit the elbow off the knee and stopped looking, he hasn\u2019t looked for the second swipe. I think, if he sends the referee to the screen, the referee has all options. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Firstly, he can send him off, which I think he probably would do because Ekitike is going to be away. The only doubt is, is it too far from goal? But he\u2019s a class forward.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-were-crystal-palace-denied-a-legitimate-goal\">Were Crystal Palace denied a legitimate goal?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Chelsea 0-0 Crystal Palace<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No goal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka polls says: <\/strong>Goal (59.2%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Crystal Palace thought they had taken an early lead against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge. Eberechi Eze had struck with a free-kick, which was too powerful for Robert Sanchez. But the goal was checked, and eventually disallowed. The reason given was due to Marc Guehi being less than one metre away from the Chelsea wall. That particular rule was brought in six years ago, but reportedly wasn&#8217;t something for VAR to rule on. But apparently it is, and Crystal Palace were the unlucky first team to be on the receiving end of such a review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-did-man-utd-deserve-a-penalty\">Did Man Utd deserve a penalty?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Man Utd 0-1 Arsenal<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>No penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka polls says: <\/strong>Penalty (55.1%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There was late drama at Old Trafford with Manchester United feeling they should have been awarded a penalty. Matheus Cunha was the man to go down in the box, under challenge from William Saliba. Cunha had received the ball in the box but Saliba made contact before he could turn. The referee waved play on and VAR stuck with the decision. File this one under &#8220;the referee&#8217;s decision remains, whatever way it goes&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-was-james-tarkowski-rightfully-penalised\">Was James Tarkowski rightfully penalised?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Match result: Leeds 1-0 Everton<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Original decision: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>VAR says: <\/strong>Penalty<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Squawka polls says: <\/strong>No penalty (59.9%)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another late penalty, this time given. Another handball call, this time given. James Tarkowski conceded a late penalty for Everton against Leeds, which was scored by Lukas Nmecha. Although Tarkowski&#8217;s arm was close to his body, it was deemed that the Englishman had leaned into the path of the ball. In other words, they felt he had intentionally handled the ball.<\/p>\n\n\n<h3><strong>Read more:<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/news\/\"><strong>Latest football news<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/bet\/football-tips\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Football betting tips<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/bet\/betting-sites\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Best betting sites<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/bet\/betting-sites\/best-free-bet-offers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Best free bet offers<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/bet\/football-tips\/accumulator\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Football accumulator tips<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Each week, Squawka&#8217;s VAR table recalculates the standings by removing the impact of VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;. Those errors are as voted for by Squawka followers on our polls on X, based on each gameweek&#8217;s most controversial VAR calls. By focusing only on the most recent round of fixtures, this alternative view highlights the immediate impact of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":112,"featured_media":1395642,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"premier league table without var","_yoast_wpseo_title":"","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.","footnotes":""},"tags":[],"features-category":[],"squawka-category":[],"class_list":["post-1395637","features","type-features","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":{"external_featured_image_url":"","hide_featured_image_pattern":false},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#039;errors&#039; | Squawka | EN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we&#039;ll be asking Squawka&#039;s X followers to vote on each gameweek&#039;s most controversial VAR calls.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#039;errors&#039;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we&#039;ll be asking Squawka&#039;s X followers to vote on each gameweek&#039;s most controversial VAR calls.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Squawka | EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SquawkaFootballNews\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@squawka\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"88 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Harry Edwards\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4e62e4b7416dff4a81adf12d6340823d\"},\"headline\":\"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-25T18:48:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":19981,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/media.squawka.com\\\/images\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/19124525\\\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/\",\"name\":\"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors' | Squawka | EN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/media.squawka.com\\\/images\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/19124525\\\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-25T18:48:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/media.squawka.com\\\/images\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/19124525\\\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/media.squawka.com\\\/images\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/19124525\\\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1440,\"caption\":\"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors'\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Squawka\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Features\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/features\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Squawka | EN\",\"description\":\"Football News, Stats, and More...\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4e62e4b7416dff4a81adf12d6340823d\",\"name\":\"Harry Edwards\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Harry Edwards\"},\"description\":\"Harry Edwards has been writing for Squawka since 2017, producing match content, betting tips, news, features, quizzes and a lot more. He has additional focus on women's football, FPL and FIFA\\\/EAFC. Harry is a Chelsea fan and also has an interest in tennis and darts.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/harryedwards16\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.squawka.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/harry-edwards\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors' | Squawka | EN","description":"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors'","og_description":"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/","og_site_name":"Squawka | EN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SquawkaFootballNews\/","article_modified_time":"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1440,"url":"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@squawka","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"88 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/"},"author":{"name":"Harry Edwards","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4e62e4b7416dff4a81adf12d6340823d"},"headline":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;","datePublished":"2026-05-25T18:48:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/"},"wordCount":19981,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg","inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/","url":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/","name":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors' | Squawka | EN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-25T18:48:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-02T16:29:38+00:00","description":"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/media.squawka.com\/images\/2025\/08\/19124525\/premier-league-table-var-errors-2025-26-featured-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1440,"caption":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR 'errors'"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/var-errors-premier-league-2025-26\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Squawka","item":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Features","item":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/features\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"How the 2025-26 Premier League table would look without VAR &#8216;errors&#8217;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/","name":"Squawka | EN","description":"Football News, Stats, and More...","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4e62e4b7416dff4a81adf12d6340823d","name":"Harry Edwards","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e0026fa9c4643646cbd6cb2bfceaaec1552223b05885c8c1ea9b98ffcc00c20f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Harry Edwards"},"description":"Harry Edwards has been writing for Squawka since 2017, producing match content, betting tips, news, features, quizzes and a lot more. He has additional focus on women's football, FPL and FIFA\/EAFC. Harry is a Chelsea fan and also has an interest in tennis and darts.","sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/harryedwards16"],"url":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/author\/harry-edwards\/"}]}},"yoast_title":"","yoast_description":"During the 2025-26 Premier League season, we'll be asking Squawka's X followers to vote on each gameweek's most controversial VAR calls.","yoast_keyword":"premier league table without var","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/features\/1395637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/features"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/features"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/112"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/features\/1395637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1451957,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/features\/1395637\/revisions\/1451957"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1395642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1395637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1395637"},{"taxonomy":"features-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/features-category?post=1395637"},{"taxonomy":"squawka-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.squawka.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/squawka-category?post=1395637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}