Why signing Arjen Robben would have won Liverpool the league

Robben

Jamie Carragher’s revelation this morning that Liverpool sought to sign Bayern Munich’s Arjen Robben, when he was at a low ebb at the German champions, symbolises the minuscule difference between winning a league title and finishing, as Liverpool did, in second place.

It is with relative conviction that that assertion can be made. Although Liverpool were never that far off the pace over the course of the league season, they only became genuine contenders with the true emergence of Raheem Sterling, who belied his age to propel Liverpool towards an unlikely title challenge.

Prior to Christmas, he struggled to impress. As the season wore on, he became the league’s form player, to the extent that he forced himself into England manager Roy Hodgson’s plans for the World Cup.

Carragher explained that Liverpool sought to sign him, telling the press: “Brendan Rodgers tried to sign him for Liverpool before the 2013 Champions League final.

“He wasn’t a regular for Bayern then but he scored the winner at Wembley against Borussia Dortmund and has since gone from strength to strength.

Robben, who has demonstrated his place amongst the world’s best players at this summer’s World Cup, would have added undoubted quality to Liverpool’s forward line. Played on the right, he would have given Liverpool an option before Sterling made himself undroppable. They would have undoubtedly picked up more points over the first half of the season, which would have been the difference between finishing below Manchester City or above them.

Given his statistics last season, Robben would have fit in nicely with the rest of Liverpool's forward line.

Given his statistics last season, Robben would have fit in nicely with the rest of Liverpool’s forward line.

The utilisation of Robben at the World Cup itself also speaks for how he could have made a difference at Liverpool last season. Liverpool were utterly reliant on the twin striking talents of Luis Suarez and Daniel Sturridge, who scored 52 goals in the Premier League between them.

Second-choice talents like Iago Aspas barely made a difference over the course of the season. Robben has regularly featured as a striker in Louis van Gaal’s 5-3-2, performing exceptionally in the role. He has three goals in the four World Cup games that the Netherlands have played thus far.

Despite Liverpool’s reliance on Suarez and Sturridge, both spent swathes of the season out of action. Suarez was suspended at the start of the campaign for his bite on Branislav Ivanovic. Sturridge was injured over winter. The recruitment of Robben would have allowed Liverpool to maintain their form even in the face of these absences, given his ability to play in the same striking role both Suarez and Sturridge occupy.

Robben's exceptional World Cup form

Robben’s exceptional World Cup form

His form at the World Cup demonstrates that he is ideally suited for what is asked of Liverpool’s strikers, with Rodgers requiring both goalscoring prowess and the ability to create chances for teammates to convert. This is, of course, aside from his ability to play in his natural role on the right, where he is similarly talented.

It would be unrealistic for Liverpool to come close to signing him now, given his importance to Pep Guardiola at Bayern and the fact that he has a deal with the club running until 2017, but the purchase, at the time, would undoubtedly have made a significant difference to the outcome of Liverpool’s season. Given how close Liverpool came to finishing top, it’s reasonable to suggest that if Rodgers had got his man, the Anfield club would have won the Premier League.

Related Teams: ,

Comments

Please consult these rules when commenting. These rules outline what is acceptable and unacceptable content on Squawka News. Note that these rules are subject to change at any time. Just like football.

See commenting rules
  1. Language

    Don't use swear words or profanity of any sort. Please refrain from insulting other users, everyone is entitled to their opinion and just because you shout the loudest, doesn't make you more correct or valid in your point of view. All insulting or offensive comments will be immediately removed.

  2. No libel or other abuse

    At no point should you be making comments which are:

    • defamatory, false or misleading;
    • insulting, threatening or abusive;
    • obscene or of a sexual nature;
    • offensive, racist, sexist, homophobic or discriminatory against any religions or other groups.

    We have an absolute zero tolerance policy on this. Football is the world's language.

  3. Report abuse

    If you see a comment not adhering to rules 1 & 2 please email info@squawka.com and this comment will be reviewed by a member of the Squawka editorial team.

  4. No third party promotion

    This comment section is here to let football fans talk about football, not to allow people to sell or push products. Any comment found peddling a third party will be immediately reviewed.

  5. No linking or copyright infringement

    You must not insert links to websites or submit content which would be an infringement of copyright.

  6. Play the game/Respect the game

    Please respect these rules when commenting on Squawka News; people will disagree from time to time but please try to see each other's point of view before getting all worked up, that helps no one.